What about people with natural immunity? – Hot air

by



[ad_1]

He is making a fair point, a point made by others over the past 24 hours. Biden’s idea of ​​housing for workers who don’t want to be vaccinated is to let them get tested weekly instead. But why isn’t there also accommodation for people who have had COVID and can prove it via an antibody test?

According to an Israeli study published two weeks ago, people with natural immunity are better protected against infection than the vaccinated. A lot better if they’ve been infected recently, in fact.

Fauci was asked about it last night on CNN by Sanjay Gupta. Would it surprise you if I told you that his answer was not quite correct?

“The only thing the Israel paper didn’t tell you is whether – however high the protection against natural infection is – how durable is the durability compared to the durability of a vaccine?” he says. But the Israeli study spoke of sustainability. The researchers used two different methods to study this question. They first compared those infected in January or February of this year to those who received their second dose during the same period. Then they compared people infected at * any * time before the end of February this year to people who were vaccinated in January or February, when the vaccines first became available.

Results: People vaccinated in the first group had a 13 times greater risk of infection than those with natural immunity. This relative risk decreased in the second group to six times the risk, but the fact that those vaccinated were still more at risk than those who had COVID much earlier is important. This means that even people infected months before vaccines became available still had stronger immunity on average this year than people recently vaccinated. “This analysis has shown that natural immunity more sustainable and stronger protection against infections, symptomatic illnesses and hospitalizations due to the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to immunity induced by the two-dose BNT162b2 vaccine, ”the study concluded.

So what is Fauci talking about?

What I think he means is that the Israeli study shows that natural immunity wanes over time and gives us no idea when (if any) it might wane to the point where a person could become vulnerable to reinfection. In theory, this would be when they should be vaccinated to boost their immunity – a superhuman boost, ultimately. Hybrid immunity, in which an infected person is then vaccinated, is robust because that person’s immune system has already examined the entire virus and developed sophisticated antibodies to deal with reinfection. When their immune system re-examines the virus spike protein through vaccination, these antibodies become even more sophisticated, studies nearly foolproof.

Fauci says, I guess, that we cannot yet be sure, based on the Israeli study alone, that anyone with natural immunity Carry on to be as well protected as the vaccinated people, especially after a booster. But since the study shows all indications that they are better protected than the vaccinated * now *, why should a federal policy that is implemented * now * not make an exception to the vaccination mandate for them?

Here’s Ron DeSantis making a case for those with natural immunity this afternoon and taking a few hits at Biden. Look, then read:

One thing that jumps out at me in his comments is how he appears to oppose employers’ vaccination mandates on the merits, not just because of excessive constitutional infringement by the White House. There is a legitimate legal question as to whether the regulatory authority over commerce delegated by Congress to OSHA grants that agency policing authority over public health in the manner that states enjoy under the Tenth Amendment. . But that is not the crux of DeSantis’ objection. He doesn’t like Biden’s tenure because he’s worried that unvaccinated workers will lose their jobs if they don’t comply.

Well, that would also happen under a vaccine mandate from a private employer, which is legal in Florida. Does DeSantis oppose this as well, even though they are appropriate under the law and would improve vaccination rates in Florida? Between that and his staunch opposition to vaccine passports, he has now sided with anti-vaccines twice for the right of business owners to run their stores as they see fit.

Exit question via Joel Mathis: What is the Republican alternative to vaccine mandates to try to contain the pandemic? DeSantis mentions at one point that the United States has more cases now than there were a year ago (although he does not mention which state has been a major driver of the increase in national totals this summer) and he reminds everyone of the failure of Biden’s pre-Delta promise to “stop the virus.” He’s an honest cop. So what’s the GOP’s plan to shut it down? DeSantis has spent the last month touting monoclonal antibodies as an important treatment for COVID, which is good – but it’s also part of Biden’s plan. What do Republicans want him to do to reduce the cases and hospitalizations that he is not doing? What would President DeSantis do?



[ad_2]

Source link