[ad_1]
This year’s United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP26, should largely focus on one contentious article in the Paris Agreement: Article 6. Much of this article deals with regulations in carbon markets, and it is the final element of the Agreement pending international consensus on how it should be applied. Critics are quick to say that the results of these negotiations could have huge impacts on the amount of emissions reduced during this decade, which would make them a decisive factor in limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius.
But first, let’s take a step back: are carbon markets really such an answer to our climate problems? Who do they benefit and who do they hurt? What in fact is in Article 6, and what are the best and worst possible outcomes of the COP?
In this GLF Live on 1October 4 at 4:00 PM CEST / 10:00 ESTwe will hear from Paul Burgers, a longtime forestry researcher and project implementer who is currently working at the heart of carbon market certification for local communities in Indonesia. Through a short question-and-answer session, he will help answer fundamental questions and give first-hand experience on what is needed in the COP negotiations to make carbon markets the path to climate change mitigation. which we need.
Paul Burgers has been working in the forestry sector for almost 30 years. He currently works for a Dutch social enterprise that helps local communities in Indonesia achieve carbon credit certification. Previously, he was a project manager for an initiative that examined the indirect effects of oil palm production in Sumatra, Indonesia and studied indigenous agroforestry practices and small-scale dairy farming in Indonesia and Zimbabwe respectively . He holds a doctorate from the University of Utrecht.
[ad_2]
Source link