Women without children are 72% more likely to die of cancer than mothers



[ad_1]

Women without children are more likely to die of cancer than mothers, because "not having a family encourages an unhealthy lifestyle of drinking and staying late"

  • The study followed 1% of the population of England and Wales every decade for 50 years
  • Having a family can encourage parents to drink less and go home earlier
  • Children may expose their parents to infections that enhance their immunity

Alexandra Thompson Senior Health Reporter for Mailonline

Research suggests that women without children are 72% more likely to die of cancer than mothers.

Scientists have followed one percent of the population of England and Wales for 50 years to draw conclusions.

Researchers believe that clear behavioral changes occur when you start a family, including drinking less and not staying late, which can protect against cancer.

Research suggests that women without children are 72% more likely to die of cancer. Scientists think that

Research suggests that women without children are 72% more likely to die of cancer. Scientists think that

Research suggests that women without children are 72% more likely to die of cancer. Scientists believe that "not having a family encourages an unhealthy life to stay late" (stock)

The research was conducted by the University of Klagenfurt, Austria, under the direction of Professor Paul Schweinzer, Department of Economics.

Scientists analyzed data on parenthood, marital status and income from the Office of National Statistics Longitudinal Study (ONS-LS).

ONS-LS collected information on people living in England and Wales in the 1971, 1981, 1991, 2001 and 2011 censuses.

The findings – published in the journal Scientific Reports – revealed that women with children are less likely to die of cancer.

For example, among 70-year-old women without children, the risk of dying from the disease would be 1.3%, compared to 0.4% for those with a family.

Mothers also have half the risk of dying from infectious diseases.

The researchers believe that this could be due to the "parental co-immunization hypothesis" – the theory that a mother's or father's immune system "regenerates itself" via the brain. exposure to the infection of a child.

This strengthened immune system gives parents a better chance of fighting infections in the elderly.

FOOD IN WHOLE GRAINS REDUCES THE RISK OF LIVER CANCER BY 37%

A study released earlier this month is a diet rich in whole grain fiber, bran and cereals.

But an increase in fruit or vegetable fiber consumption has no effect, Harvard scientists have found.

One study found that those who ate the most whole grains in their diets were 37% less likely than those whose diets were low in healthy beans.

A diet rich in sound also reduces the risk by 30%, while the seed decreases by 11%.

& # 39;[Children] bring infections back home [from school] they need to strengthen their defenses, "Professor Schweinzer told The Times.

"As a by-product, they almost killed the parents.

"If any mechanism delays vaccination over time, it might be beneficial to do it again."

The same protection also applies to fathers but to a lesser extent.

The findings suggest that men with children are three times less likely to die from infectious diseases, two-thirds less likely to die of cancer and a little more than half less likely to die from an accident, of being at risk of death. a murder or a suicide.

But marriage does not have the same protective effects.

Men who say "yes" have a 171% chance of dying from cancer and 123% more deaths from heart disease than singles who are 75 years old.

And women who get married are 18% more likely to die of cancer.

Researchers worry about married but childless couples who could become "more sedentary" and adopt a "dissolved lifestyle".

The findings further suggest that having a high income and owning a home protects against premature death, but not as effectively as having children.

[ad_2]

Source link