[ad_1]
The first five months have been promising for President Cyril Ramaphosa.
Although the last two months of Ramaphosa 's reign have caused much ink to flow, along with the new measure adopted to fight corruption, such as changes in the councils' recommendations. administration and / or management of large public enterprises; a survey on the tax administration; actions to strengthen purchasing; signing contracts with independent power producers; and in general, with the intention of eliminating waste of expenses, the concern is prevalent inside and outside the ANC, that Ramaphosa does not not the support of the mbades that Jacob Zuma appreciated.
Among the other notable achievements of the Ramaphosa Presidency dollars invested investments to grow the economy. But the real test will come when these billions of investments will be able to create well paying jobs and empower the millions of people who are still trapped in poverty.
The 50% to 60% support the ANC since Ramaphosa replaced Zuma in February, are clearly not the official vote and can not be considered the voice of the mbades who vote in the elections.
Many surveys are conducted prematurely and people can say no matter what. In addition, people's response depends more or less on how the question or questions were asked.
Surveys are also not the surest way of knowing what the elector is likely to do at the polls. In other words, the potential voter can change their mind at the polling station and vote for any other candidate.
For example, most of the dozens of people surveyed in the last two weeks still believe that Zuma has a lot to offer the country. Some even said that they lacked his leadership skills.
Whatever it is, Zuma is innocent until proven otherwise. The current charges of 783 suspicious payments to Zuma allegedly received from Thint, in connection with the arms deal, were dismissed outside the court.
And the so-called "state capture" which strangely calls "the State" of Capture ", the latter meaning something totally different from the first, will likely not be in front of
And as Zuma has already pointed out, the "state capture" would mean that the executive, the judiciary, and the legislature were captured.
And we know that this is not what happened here in South Africa At least not under Zuma's reign.
But what we do know is that, as reports have confirmed that Zuma still enjoys great support in the Movement, the Army through Umkhonto We Sizwe (MK)
Not to mention the support that Zuma always has with some of the top six leaders of the ANC, the National Executive Committee (NEC), military veterans, various provinces, religious leaders and badociatio Professional NSs, various leading ANC leaders across the country, including in the current government, and other structures of the ANC and Alliance structures.
In the broader context of things, the "exile" unit that since the 1990 ANC disengagement has gained ground in the political space in South Africa, would rather be concerned by his future with Ramaphosa, an "inxile" at the helm.
Even though exiles have their differences, they question what the future will look like without an "exiled" leader at the helm.
The main thing that needs to be understood about Ramaphosa, is that as popular as the market, the media and the elites, it does not necessarily have a safe riding in the Movement, in Particularly where it matters most, the ANC Branches
If indeed Ramaphosa does not have the support he needs from the ANC's mbad structures; he could be the weakest leader that the ANC and South Africa have ever had.
In any case, the ANC will not gain much from excluding its former leader and even the leaders who have served as presidents of the country since 1994 (except the late Nelson Mandela). Leaving Thabo Mbeki and Kgalema Motlanthe out of the structures of the ANC, executive and government of the country.
For example, Mbeki, with his proven credentials on the international scene, could become Minister of External Relations; while Motlanthe who is capable and credible, could be returned as minister to the presidency. And Zuma would become Prime Minister
Although the Constitution does not allow a president to serve more than two terms; he does not say that a former president can not occupy another executive position.
It makes no sense not to use the experience, skills, contacts and ability of our past presidents to move the country forward. By bringing back the former presidents of Democratic South Africa, Ramaphosa would become more and more influential for the achievement of another "Mandela Magic" & # 39; and for the unification of a party troubled by factionalism
. Democratic South Africa, we would once again have taught the world a lesson in political diplomacy and rationality.
The ANC would have a united and stable organization. South Africa would have a strong, united and effective leadership organization. Business and investor confidence would skyrocket. Millions of jobs would be created; and poverty and underdevelopment would be a thing of the past.
Mbeki and Zuma, as former presidents of the ANC, are already qualified to appear on the NEC as an additional list of members. Surely the ANC NEC can welcome Motlanthe as the former president and vice president of the republic, and former secretary general and vice president of the ANC.
Ramaphosa should now imagine how this initiative could strengthen his public image and that of the ANC; But above all, this will better position Ramaphosa in the structures of the ANC, who are still bleeding from the saga Zuma / Mbeki
The return of Zuma, Mbeki and Motlanthe. in the national political fold will strengthen the ANC and South Africa too. South Africa needs a strong ruling party.
After all, that's what the founding fathers of the ANC had in mind.
And that's what Madiba would have wanted.
Disclaimer: All articles and letters published on MyNews24 were written independently by members of the News24 community. The opinions of users published on News24 are therefore theirs and do not necessarily represent the opinions of News24. News24 publishers also reserve the right to edit or delete any comments received.
[ad_2]Source link
