[ad_1]
Cape Town – The Public Protector reacted with amazement at reports that her report on Prime Minister Helen Zille's colonialist tweets was rejected by the Western Cape legislature.
DA chief bad, Mark Wiley, fired the report on the basis that Mkhwebane had misunderstood the law and that the report was not in his jurisdiction.
In response to the DA's actions, Mkhwebane acting spokeswoman Oupa Segalwe said that if the report were true, the legislature could be a "questioning" of the public protector instead of the government. to badist and protect it to ensure the independence, impartiality, dignity and efficiency of the institution, as required by the Constitution
. in the case involving the EFF and other opposition parties, including the DA and the president of the National Assembly, that the report of corrective action of the Regarding the former President Jacob Zuma, the parties had argued that the National Assembly had not held Zuma responsible for the Nkandla project, as had recommended the former Public Protector
. Once the Public Protector has written a report in response to a complaint, you should address the recommendations. "It's not up to you to make shenanigans," said a legal expert.
Other legal observers also noted that the fact that the report had been subject to judicial review would have been the only basis on which the case was sub judice.
Any decision made before the finalization of the examination may need to be modified depending on the outcome. Segalwe stated that the remedy of the public protector was binding unless it was overturned by a court
The Constitutional Court also observed that the "public protector would undoubtedly have no dignity and would be ineffective if his directions could be ignored willy-nilly "
In 2017, Zille tweeted:" For those claiming the legacy of colonialism was ONLY negative, think of our independent judiciary, transportation infrastructure, etc. "[19659002] Mkhwebane found that Zille's conduct was unfit under the Constitution and that the tweet caused much suffering and suffering to the victims of apartheid and colonialism in South Africa.
Zille submitted the judicial review report and filed documents with the Gauteng High Court
Argus Weekend
[ad_2]
Source link
