Various opinions of Tshwane residents at expropriation hearings



[ad_1]

The Constitutional Review Committee of Parliament says that despite the fact that the hearings were changed at the last minute, it did not affect the outcome.

A participant addresses the Parliament's Constitutional Review Committee during the land hearings in Pretoria. Photo: @ ParliamentofRSA / Twitter.

JOHANNESBURG – The last day of hearings on land in Gauteng focused on job security, investor confidence and restoration of the dignity of blacks in South Africa.

The Constitutional Review Commission states that despite the fact that the hearings, which took place in the city of Tshwane last Saturday, were changed at the last minute, it did not affect the result.

Members of the public made oral submissions on the question of whether section 25 of the Constitution should be amended to allow the expropriation of land without compensation.

Committee Chair Vincent Smith says the various groups in society have expressed different views.

"They all raised questions about investors' fears. So, all those who were for the amendment counted essentially punch against punch with those against him. "

This participant says that the concept of private ownership of land is alien to the African people, the land is not a private possession #LandExpropriation #Constitution pic.twitter .com / ZH38tGQ7mX

– Parliament of RSA (@ParliamentofRSA) July 28, 2018

If you think you now have little time to wait until there is even less if this economy implodes #LandExpropriation #Constitution pic.twitter.com/jUwngupKaS

– Parliament of RSA (@ParliamentofRSA) July 28, 2018

This participant says that she does not support the amendment of Article 25 because it has lost confidence in the government. "The same government brought us the Guptas, it is the same government that brought us electronic tolls, how can I trust this government? " pic.twitter.com/DUYq hk13uZ

– Parliament of RSA (@ParliamentofRSA) July 28, 2018

[ad_2]
Source link