[ad_1]
The Democratic presidential candidate, Cory Booker, campaigning Monday in New Hampshire, said it was a "lie" for critics to say the Green New Deal is too expensive to implement.
GREEN NEW DEAL, THE "NEW DOCTOR" DRAWING "MEDICARE-FOR-ALL", FROM OTHER DEMO 2020
"This is the lie that currently exists," Booker told Fox News in Nashua, N.H., while campaigning in the country's first state.
The New Jersey senator was questioned about the costs of the Green New Deal, supported by New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and other progressives, who aimed to implement a range of programs aimed at big governments while pursuing a goal of "greenhouse gas emissions" – essentially, a total economic transformation towards clean energy that includes, among other things, the modernization of buildings throughout the country.
The Wall Street Journal recently announced it was costing nearly $ 2,000 per apartment at the New York City Housing Authority to switch to LED lighting, which lasts longer and consumes less energy than incandescent light bulbs. Asked about this report, Booker said it was possible to "revive your economy and create a bold green future," citing his experience as mayor of Newark, N.J.
"We have modernized our buildings in respect of the environment. Allows taxpayers to save money, create jobs for our community and reduce our carbon footprint, "said Booker.
He added: "This lie that is put aside – that being environmentally responsible and environmentally responsible means that you have to harm the economy – a lie."
WHAT IS THE GREEN NEW DEAL? LOOKING AT THE ECONOMIC AND CLIMATE CONCEPT PUSHED BY PROGRESSIVES
The Green New Deal is a radical proposal designed to combat income inequality and climate change at the same time. It is inspired by President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal package of programs and public works projects created to help the economy during the Great Depression – but in many ways goes much further.
The deployment itself was confused by the publication of Ocasio-Cortez documents which, among other things, promised economic security even to those who "refused" to work.
The plan itself aims to eliminate greenhouse gas emissions from the manufacturing and agricultural industries and to significantly expand the energy sources to meet 100% of the demand in energy from renewable sources. The proposal also provides for a job guarantee program and universal health care, among others.
Republican critics vehemently rejected the proposal, citing part of the price, estimated at around $ 7 trillion. Republicans have also decried the idea of the job guarantee, calling it a "deeply flawed policy" detrimental to small businesses.
Anne Marie Riha and Kaitlyn Schallhorn of Fox News contributed to this report.
[ad_2]
Source link