[ad_1]
German Research Minister Anja Karliczek is in favor of an investigation to determine why this false study could have been published / AFP / Archives
Journalists have published in a not very well-known scientific journal a fake cancer study, in the context of a vast investigation on unscrupulous publications, said Le Monde on Thursday.
The purpose of the investigation was to show that anyone, on condition of paying, could pbad "false science" for real.
Journalists from two German media outlets, the daily Süddeutsche Zeitung and the public radio NDR, have reported to the journal Journal of Integrative Oncology "the results of a clinical study showing that propolis extract was more colorectal cancer than conventional chemotherapies "
Propolis is a resinous substance derived from trees and transformed by bees to build the cells of their hives.
" The study was fictitious, the data made, and the authors, affiliated to an imaginary research institute, did not exist either. The publication was nevertheless accepted in less than ten days and published on April 24, "explained Le Monde.
The daily's website offers a link to an archived version of this study, which was withdrawn once officials
It states that the researchers compared the effectiveness of chemotherapy with propolis capsules, and the conclusion of the pseudo-scientific article speaks of an unrelated subject. effect of mbadage on thromboembolic diseases
German Research Minister Anja Karliczek said she was in favor of an investigation to determine why this false study was published.
the interest of science itself, "she said, quoted by the German news agency DPA, as saying that everything must be done" to ensure that credibility and trust in science are not affected (…) It is bi in that such errors are brought to light. Because it is only in this way that we can change what is wrong. "
The magazine in question is published by an Indian publisher, Omics, but according to Le Monde, it is" dozens of houses ". unscrupulous edition "who" have created hundreds of open-access journals with the name snoring, all the finery of true scholarly journals. "They affect a multitude of scientific disciplines.
Without any control over the quality of the works presented , they claim to the authors "a few hundred euros" per article, according to Le Monde and NDR.
In the most prestigious journals, where to publish requires a review by experts scientists of the same field (called "peer evaluation" "), and where the validation process usually takes several months, the authors do not always pay.
A journalist from NDR also told on the air that he improvised himself, with a colleague, a researcher in computer science thanks to a fake inter site net of university and false references to scientific articles. Both even intervened in a conference where they "received a prize at the end".
afp
Source link
