[ad_1]
Ursula Owusu Ekuful
A High Court of Accra (Human Rights Division) ordered the Ministry of Communications to disclose all documents regarding the controversial $ 89 million contract KelniGVG .
This follows a request from John Ato Bonful, and Nana Adom Kanyi, as well as a lobby group, "The Citizens of Ghana Movement & # 39; obliging the Ministry to publish the documents.
Their request is in the context of the agreement between the government and the private entity that the applicants say
However, the Ministry of Communication made it clear that he was ready to provide the documents requested by the applicants.
The court presided over by Judge Anthony Yeboah later ordered the ministry to release all documents. the documents concerning the contract between the government and the private company.
When the judge asked the Deputy Minister of Communications: George Andah, who appeared in court, said the department could make the document available between four and seven days.
In the meantime, the court adjourned an interlocutory injunction hearing by another group of plaintiffs on July 5, 2018.
The plaintiffs were asking the court to issue an injunction against the plaintiff. 39 execution of the contract saying: When the case was called, the applicants' lawyers told the court that he had just received an affidavit against their application and that it would take them a little of time to study it and file a complementary letter.
The court then adjourned the case.
The contract has become a subject of controversy between the think tank IMANI Africa and the Ministry, The Ministry argues that it is intended for the design and implementation of a platform common for traffic monitoring, income insurance and mobile money monitoring.
But the plaintiffs who are not convinced the contract stormed the court seeking an interlocutory injunction to prevent the government and its rightholders from implementing and operationalizing a common platform for monitor revenues of telecommunication companies.
The complainants claim that the architecture of the common platform linking only to the billing node provided by the telecommunications companies as stipulated by Law 864, the connection will be made to all physical nodes, and it will be a violation of Article 18 (2) of the 1992 Constitution.
Applicants, mobile networks have the legal obligation to protect their customers, including plaintiffs under Article 73 Moreover, the applicants consider that the planned implementation of the common platform constitutes a real threat to the enjoyment of their fundamental right to the protection of human rights and privacy. . the protection of privacy, adding that the implementation of the common platform and the violation of the applicant's right to privacy would be irreparable.
BY Abdul Razak Gibril
Source link
