[ad_1]
Gold Fields (NYSE: GFI) and Pan American Silver (NASDAQ: PAAS) are both mid-cap core materials companies, but what is the top title? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, badyst recommendations and valuation.
Earnings and Valuation
This table compares income, earnings per share and valuation of Gold Fields and Pan American Silver
Gross Income | Price / Sales Ratio | Net Income | Earnings per share [19659005] Price-to-earnings ratio | ||
Gold Fields | $ 2.76 billion | 1.07 | – $ 18.70 million | $ 0.24 | ] 15.04 |
Pan American silver | $ 816.83 million | 3.10 [19659011] $ 120.99 million | $ 0.51 | 32.39 |
Pan American Silver has lower incomes, but higher incomes than Gold Fields. Gold Fields is trading at a price / earnings ratio lower than that of Pan American Silver, indicating that it is currently the most affordable of the two stocks.
Dividends
Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $ 0.07 per share and a dividend yield of 1.9%. Pan American Silver pays an annual dividend of $ 0.14 per share and a dividend yield of 0.8%. Gold Fields pays 29.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Pan American Silver distributes 27.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have sound distribution ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with profits for the next few years. Gold Fields has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gold Fields is clearly the best dividend stock, given its higher yield and dividend growth history.
Volatility & Risk
Gold Fields has a beta of -0.89, suggesting that its price is 189% less volatile than Comparatively, Pan American Silver has a beta of 0.3, suggesting that its price is 70% less volatile than the S & P 500.
Institutional & Insider Ownership
33.4% of Gold Fields shares are held by institutional investors. In comparison, 49.6% of Pan American Silver's shares are held by institutional investors. 12.9% of Pan American Silver shares are held by insiders. A strong institutional ownership indicates that the big money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe that & # 39; an action is ready for long-term growth.
This table compares the net margins of Gold Fields and Pan American Silver.
Net Margins | Return on Assets | Return on Assets | |
Fields of Gold | N / A | N / A | N / A |
Pan American Silver [19659010] 18.19% | 6.35% | 4.89% |
Analyst Recommendations
This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Gold Fields and Pan American Silver, provided by MarketBeat.
Ranking of ratings | Place Clbadification | Buy Notes | Buy It Strong | Score Rating | |
Gold Fields | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2.43 |
Pan American Silver | 0 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 2.75 |
Gold Fields currently has a consensual price target of 5 , $ 66, indicating a potential upside of 56.65%. Pan American Silver has a consensus price target of $ 21.28, indicating a potential upside of 28.80%. Given the upside potential of Gold Fields, research badysts clearly believe that Gold Fields is more favorable than Pan American Silver
Abstract
Pan American Silver defeats Gold Fields on 12 out of 16 factors compared between the two stocks.
About Gold Fields
About Pan American Silver
Source link
Tags American Contrast Fields financial GFI gold PAAS Pan Silver