Ken Agyapong's lawyers oppose sitting on the Privilege Committee

[ad_1]

Following a Refusal Former Assin Central MP Kennedy Agyapong appeared before Parliament's Privilege Committee and appeared before committee members on Tuesday, surrounded by his lawyers, KT Hammond and Alex Afenyo Markin

by the parliamentary committee after making derogatory remarks about the house.

But before the start of the session, one of Mr. Agyapong's counsel, Alex Afenyo Markin raised objections on which he asked the chair of the committee Privileges as Infringements of Proceedings.

First, Mr. Afenyo Markin indicated that some of the members of the Committee had "injured" the case before the House, prior to the sitting that they had had.

"A friend of the Committee is also quoted with respect as having said that a prima facie case has been established against the Honorable Kennedy Agyapong. "

" And I read, after a meeting a member of the Committee, Mr. Samson Ahi told reporters that the Committee had determined that the complaint was well-founded. Mr. Speaker, when you submit a question to a committee for rulings, you do not depart from the committee's mandate to broadcast to the world that you have found prima facie evidence to indict the respondent

. Since there is no report duly tabled in the Chamber to determine whether a prima facie case has been established, we submit that these members, including the complainant who gave an interview to the press, violated the reputation of the Honorable Kennedy Agyapong.

"We therefore consider that taking into account all these members, since they had no reason to question the publication by Graphic (Daily Graphic), they should to challenge themselves. of the procedure, the probability of bias becomes very worrying for us. Because they have already predetermined what they deem meritorious and that they have already led the media to think in one way or another against the respondent.

He again argued that the proper procedure had not been followed in the first He postulated that after tabling the motion, no member supported the motion until the Honorable Inusah Fuseini does not support it.

"Mr. Speaker, the proceedings in a quasi-criminal matter before the House require not only that we are supposed to focus on the substance, but the processes required to take action are relevant and appropriate. very critical, "he said.

" … our rule is that when a motion is moved, it must be pbaded; the motion was moved, we heard contributions, it was not even supported, and there is a file, Mr. Speaker … "

Finally, Mr. Afenyo Markin referred to a letter signed by three deputies of the Central Committee. Region namely Cynthia Morrison, Naana Eyiah Quansah and Nsowah-Djan Samuel who had all sought to be excused from the session, but the chairman of the Committee; Joseph Osei Owusu argued that the letter was not formally tabled before the committee and therefore could not be considered.

However, after further deliberations, Joseph Osei Owusu announced that the letter had been sent by the clerk. other objections raised by Kennedy Agyapong's lawyer

He then informed the audience that the committee was to restrict the public hearing of the case to a private meeting in order to make a decision on the letter

. [ad_2]
Source link