Christopher McQuarrie thinks that the current tastes of the Oscars were reactions to the tastes of yesteryear

Nothing happens in the void. As will all those who have studied the history of cinema, movies are often created in the spirit of what preceded it, as well as recent events in history. It's not a huge surprise, is it? Even the reaction of the public to these things is influenced by what has gone before. Just look at the rise and fall of the western, a genre that has gone through several phases before going out completely.

The same can apparently be said of the consideration of the awards, including the grandfather of all the film awards, the Academy Awards. For many years, they have avoided the most popular films of the year in favor of smaller and more intimate films, whose number of viewers is low, even nil, including films like Moonlight and Projector. There has recently been talk of a potential film category, but this has since been set aside.

But what does a great Hollywood director think? More precisely, Mission: Impossible – Fallout director Christopher McQuarrie. Here's what he said collider.

"I think at one point we've lost sight of the fact that what we're here to do – sorry if it sounds shocking to anyone – is to amuse and move people. Part of me looks at it and says, "Well, there are some great movies that do it too." I read online the exchanges, the arguments on how some movies were not eligible because they are just not Oscars. movies. This guy had this incredibly articulated seven-paragraph argument for all the things that qualified a movie, none of which was Titanic. Not long ago, a film of this type was commercially successful and won all Oscars. I think that part of what we see now is a bit of a reaction in return for that. There is a morning after and people say, "What did we do? We awarded an Oscar for a $ 2 billion film and not these other films? "

RELATED – Director Christopher McQuarrie talks about Man Of Steel 2

And shortly after Titanic, the Academy awarded Oscars to the Return of the King – but it was largely thanks to the forces of the entire trilogy, and not to a single film. However, since then, the Oscars have almost always been a small movie game. Will we soon reach an era in which we regularly reward larger films? Hm …

Do you think that big films should qualify more regularly for the biggest awards at the Oscars? Let us know below!

Do not forget to share this message on your Facebook wall and with your Twitter followers! Just click on the buttons at the top of this page.

SOURCE: collider