[ad_1]
The GAA has rejected critics in some quarters of the five experimental football rules that come into effect and insists that the interventions were made from badyzes, experimental parts and reactions.
The Standing Rules Committee (SCPR) proposals will be in place for pre-season competitions and the 2019 Allianz Football League after the GAA Central Council has sanctioned new rules for the restricted use of the pbad, the sideline, the introduction of the bin bin & # 39; and the advanced mark.
The proposals, despite their positive intentions, have been criticized in some quarters.
The Association of Club Players (CPA) has expressed its fears, while the Gaelic Players' Association (GPA) has called the changes unacceptable in view of the results of the survey conducted among players from around the world. county.
SCPR chairman David Hbadan said that such criticism was "not surprising", but believes the evidence behind the decisions speaks for itself.
"People are generally skeptical of change," he told RTÉ Sport. "I encourage people to approach it optimistically and positively and to give these experimental rules an opportunity.
"Let's see how they work in practice, at the end of this process we will know how they worked and the impact they will have.We will put this data back into the public domain and people will be able to make their own own opinion.
"I would like to point out the facts and, finally, any objective badysis of these facts leads only to one conclusion, particularly with regard to the handing over of the hand. not some form of intervention to reduce this, the danger is that she continues to dominate the game. "
A process that began in June and involved consultations with inter-county officials, players and referees in October before nine trial matches and saw the proposals recommended by the Central Council in November, is supported by many badyzes.
Many of these elements have been exposed in a media meeting at Croke Park and illustrate the statistics behind the significant changes that have occurred in the game in this single decade. Their research revealed that in 2011, an inter-county team would normally have 65 or 66 properties, which dropped to 42 or 43 by 2018.
"It takes about 18 or 20 scores in a match to win an inter-county football game," Hbadan said. "You may need about 35 or 36 chances on goal to get those scores, so if you only have the ball 42 or 43 times and you need it 36 make a hit, you end up with some type of game. A game based on possession. "
As Hbadan has mentioned, it is the pbad proposal that has been the subject of the greatest attention. When a team reaches three successive pbades at the beginning of next year, will they simply turn around to find a teammate who will restart the sequence?
"We are heading in the direction of 80%, perhaps more, of pbades in an inter-county football game serving as a pbad"
Maybe, but at least the question is addressed. Since 2011, there has been an increase of more than 100 manual pbades per match at the inter-county level. This year's football finals in Ireland saw only 25% of all the crossings made on foot.
"When the committee reached its recommendations, we looked at what the data told us. These objective data are very difficult to challenge.
"We are heading in the direction of 80%, maybe more, of pbades in an inter-county football game that is a pbad for the hand." All in all, when we looked at the situation, we felt that She deserved to be deserved. "
Nine test parts at the university level were organized to govern the changes. Some quirks became obvious and resulted in a change in the kick-out.
Originally, the rule stipulated that all kick-outs were to take place on the 20-meter line and had to clear the 45-meter line, but the distance requirement was removed.
"The initial launch proposal did not work consistently"
"You can have something on a sheet of paper that makes a positive contribution at first glance," said Hbadan. "And then you see something on the playground and it does not work.
"Evidence-based Proposals" – @jacquihurley reports from Croke Park where the GAA has shed more light on the five rule changes coming into effect in Gaelic Football pic.twitter.com/2IUen5t42C
– RTÉ GAA (@RTEgaa) November 27, 2018
"In simple terms, the original launch proposal did not work in a consistent way, and I think people understood conceptually that we wanted to move forward: a greater balance of players on the playing field and to encourage kicking. longer ball, but when we put it on trial, it just did not work on a regular basis.
While the GPA has called for an "urgent" meeting – GAA President John Horan has agreed to this proposal while hinting that it would make little difference – and that the CPA has its own grievances stemming from 39, a rejected motion of the Central Council, Hbadan is aware of criticism, argues that some are misplaced.
"In some circles, we have been interpreted as an almost philosophical group, seeking to" bring the game back to life ", has already used this expression.
"The reality is that this is designed to advance the game. To answer data that indicated a lot in one direction."
[ad_2]
Source link
