[ad_1]
Have a nice evening and send us emails: [email protected]
We won FFS
Yes, it could have been better and yes, sometimes it seemed difficult, but we defeated a team that played 10 in the back and played at the break. With Jose handcuffed for Rashford who can not hit a camel with a 5-foot banjo, Rashford scores with one of his many chances then it's a brand new match.
That being said, Matic needs a long rest after playing. He looks jaded and, overall, plays shit. Play Pogba and Fred at the center with Felliani or Herrera. Valencia has been a good servant, but we need Dalot to play until the end of the season.
The Chin Chin, we are in the last 16, I understand the fans who have seen the glory years become frustrated, but believe me, this has been far worse than that, imagine being halfway to a season (finally Christmas) and your guardian is spouse. best scorer with 2 goals.
Paul Murphy, Manchester
Man Utd and Mourinho made each for the other
Oh you like it.
Enough of this "Mourinho out" bizzo.
If ever a club and a manager were made one for the other, that is Man Utd and Mourinho.
They are both relevant only because of their financial weight.
I am an English football fan since the 70s; but a lifelong sportsman and lover of karma and irony.
Man Utd has never believed in a level playing field.
I remember Liam Brady who said in the 80s: "To win a lot of money, players have to go to Man Utd, or Italy."
So, City, by corruptly painting the Manchester blue, was a lot of fun.
I'm sure it will become tiring, but it is not.
Man Utd was the Donald Trump of football long before the advent of Donald Trump.
For all sportsmen – and lovers of karma and irony – their denouement is both delicious and delicious.
NZ NZ
Parallels between Mourinho and Hughes
I found it interesting that the The mailbox was filled with José's condemnationnext door, an article on Mark Hughes failures and its inevitable plunder. There are fairly clear parallels between the two. These are actually quite similar managerial styles, although those who have operated in completely different fields. In common, they both look like men from yesterday's world.
It's easy to forget how good managers were. Ten to 15 years ago, Jose Mourinho was the football manager. He was the benchmark for tactics and motivation and his Chelsea team was very fearful in Europe. Also at this time, Mark Hughes was considered one of the brightest young managers in the top category after a successful stint in Wales, followed by a series of impressive finishes at Blackburn, with a trip to Ewood Park considered a difficult hard edifice by any team in the division.
But football, like life, has evolved. When José raised the Champions League with Porto, Facebook was only 3 months old. When Mark Hughes led Blackburn to the Top 6 and European football, Twitter had not been launched yet and the hashtags did not exist. Things are changing, times are changing. When you have had such success, how hard must it be to abandon the methods that brought you? When these methods fail, the bitterness and criticism of the world seem inevitable.
That's why Sir Alex Ferguson became the greatest manager of all time, because he did not adhere to his old proven methods. instead, he has constantly evolved, adapting and reinventing himself to the world around him. It is one thing to be great for one period of time and another to be great for all time. It's like the difference between U2 and David Bowie.
Lewis, Busby Way
As a neutral, I must say that Mark Hughes will likely be fired. If you can run a generally friendly club like Southampton and convince the neutrals to leave, you will certainly be mistaken somewhere along the line. In this case, the powerful triumvirate of results, style of play and personality.
I'm wondering what impact the public perception of the chairs has on whether or not to pull the trigger. With all the other teams in the league having a manager I can find some qualities to admire (either because of having at least one of the previous three points or a previous success), and in fact, most being rather likeable , Hughes stands out. In previous seasons, there have always been at least a few of those old, negative boys: Allardyce, Pardew, Pullis, McCleish, etc., but with Warnock laughing a bit, all the love of the haters is taking aim for the man of the saints.
If and when he goes, I also wonder who will be the next candidate for a PL position, because he really feels that the time has come for this group of managers.
Dave T (Spurs)
P.S. honorable mention to Jose Mourinho for really pushing my reasoning in search of qualities in all the other managers of the league.
I'm mad!
I've finally reached the point of no longer worrying about Manchester United. I am aware that this may seem like a slap, but I have been a fan for a long time, and I remember worse times but I never remember not worrying about it.
The club, the owners, the coach and the players make fun of the Manchester United football club, not to mention the fans, so why should I care about that?
The owners certainly care about the Manchester United Financial Corporation and the further they get from the Football Club, the less they look at me, they want my money, that's all.
So last night the teams announced … I'm mad. Some enthusiastic players but he decided to play with the clbadic combo Matic / Fellaini in the middle of the park, at the Young Boys. We have already seen how that happened.
First half, borefest, but I'm mad. Because I expect trouble, I do not expect any creativity in midfield, I do not expect goals, I expect attackers to stir the lines and I certainly do not expect big defense thing.
In the second half, the Young Boys push and almost score, except for a world-clbad De Gea stop. I'm crazy, if I'm a bit honest, part of me was thirsty for blood and wanted the Young Boys to score in the hope that it would cause changes to the club.
United scores a winning goal – I'm mad. I hardly celebrated it because I came from another long hoof to the big man who would justify that tactic in the eyes of the managers be used again and again.
The manager then comes back to remember how good he was a manager, but I do not care, but that's what he does. Me me me!
But if United had to dismiss Mourinho, that would not really bother me because the problems are much deeper than the manager. The club has ruined every appointment and signature since rot, so why would a new manager change that?
Change is needed, a big change is needed. Do the glaziers have the appetite to correct the situation, it is unlikely, but the way things are happening, the only way to keep their beloved precious is to make it work. The other option, sell to the Saudis and you know what, I think I'll give up right now!
Dave M.
It's been two and a half years since I watched this movie *, the problem is that all players ahead are too selfish and attentive to their fate or they are not properly trained. It's later, but I can not help but think that some players do not want to play with each other.
Having a lot of movement is not just about making points backwards, but working in groups to create space for EVERYONE else! Martial and Rashford do not seem to want to work together. The midfielder is accused of lack of creativity and slow play, but what are they supposed to do when the line of attack is only in a straight line against the ball and does not move. United is the easiest team to defend in the league. There is no game pattern, so they are so inconsistent, they really take full account of the individual moments or mistakes of their opponents, and I'm sorry, it will not be a quick fix, we need of Mourinho, because it will never entail that. . A new manager who must be recruited under the orders of a football director and who understands that it will take at least three years for us to improve, tear it up, start again, get rid of the mercenaries.
Duncan
Mail of fans for Matt Stead
"They came for a slice of Depay, but were fortunate enough to discover something more watering. They came to have a glimpse of this little Fekir, but their game was avoided by something more eye-catching. "
I take off my cap, good sir. Brilliant!
Krombopulos Michael, CFL, Joburg
The Lyon manager has all the secrets?
So, am I the only one to think that all the leaders of the Premier League should try to call the Lyon official to know how to stop City? If it was a knockout match, Lyon would have beaten City 4-3 in total (this is a team with a score of +35 GD after 13 league games) . Lyon's fair play, matched tactically, mentally and technically, seemed unlucky not to have beaten them a second time this season.
Maybe the city has a weakness after all …
Rami, London
Management
Forget football for a moment. Let's talk management. In all areas of life or work, from parenting to managing small teams to managing large businesses, the management element is essential to success. I have worked in advertising in Northern Ireland and have worked with and observed many companies. Those with strong leadership are by far the most successful. They are where employees are well treated, listened to, badigned a role, rewarded financially and emotionally, and follow an example set by company leaders. Employees want the company to succeed and have respect and admiration for the leader. Thus, although Mourinho has already been a good leader and a good manager, he does not fit any of these criteria. Whenever he speaks, he mines his players. His throwing of bottles of water is so childish that he is incomprehensible and gives the example that if his players followed him, he would make them crack and think that everything was fine. His comments bring me into the realm of paranoia. A leader endorses the bad and shares the good, exactly the opposite of Mourinho's current behavior.
By comparing this to the leadership of Pep and Pochettino, including Eddie Howe, among others, it is clear that United is doomed to continued failure. They do not need a manager, they need a leader and they need a quick one.
Tim McKane
[ad_2]
Source link
