[ad_1]
"We look forward to the next step: bringing our clients to court," he said in a statement.
The judge wanted to determine whether the science claimed that glyphosate could cause non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. had been properly tested and had met other conditions to be considered valid.
Chhabria spent a week in March hearing testimony from duels of epidemiologists. He asked them about the potential strengths and weaknesses of glyphosate cancer research.
Beate Ritz, epidemiologist at the University of California at Los Angeles, testified to the applicants that his review of the scientific literature had led him to conclude that glyphosate and glyphosate-based compounds such Roundup can cause non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Ritz said that a 2017 National Institutes of Health study that found no badociation between glyphosate and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma had major defects.
his own expert, Lorelei Mucci, a cancer epidemiologist at Harvard TH "When you look at the body of epidemiological literature on this subject, there is no evidence of a positive badociation between the glyphosate and the risk of NHL, "she said about non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
In his ruling on Tuesday, the judge ruled that both Ritz and Mucci could testify before a jury
Monsanto developed glyphosate in the 1970s, and the herbicide is now sold in more than 160 countries. California farmers, the most agriculturally productive state in the United States, use it on more than 200 types of crops. The herbicide has been subject to more and more scrutiny after the International Agency for Research on Cancer, which is part of the World Health Organization in France, ranked it as a "probable human carcinogen" in 2015
A series of lawsuits against Monsanto followed, and California added glyphosate to its list of chemicals known to cause cancer . Monsanto has attacked the opinion of the international research agency as an aberrant value
The Environmental Protection Agency claims that glyphosate is safe for people when it is used in accordance with label directions.
A federal judge of Sacramento labels stating that he is known to cause cancer, saying that the warning is misleading because almost all regulators have concluded that there is no no evidence that glyphosate is carcinogenic.
Source link
