[ad_1]
[Seoul = Newsweek] Reporter Kim Ji-hoon, North Korea and the United States reportedly began long-term discussions on the issue of the repatriation of American troops in the Korean war at Panmunjom on the morning of the 15th. An official of the Foreign Ministry said: "I know that a general meeting on repatriation to Panmunjom is going to take place," he said, "there is currently no confirmation on the contents of the talks between the North and the UN ".
North Korea agreed to repatriate the identified US troops immediately to the summit on December 12, and the US military prepared 100 Panmunjom-related transport cases for the same month. . In addition, Osan supplied about 150 metal pipes.
The repatriation problem was initially to be discussed in labor-level discussions, but North Korea proposed not to attend the working discussions on 12, but to hold talks on 15, It was reported that General level discussions took place by accepting the proposal. The talks between North Korea and the United Nations are only nine years old since 2009.
A USFK official said: "We can not do anything to confirm anything until the end of the year. at the end of the event, "said the head of the US Department of State.
In light of previous talks between the North and the UNC, it is likely that the US side participated in the United States Department of Justice Departmental Chief of Staff of the United Nations Department, Michael Minnie, and to the representative of North Korean Panmunjom. The representative of Panmunjom's representative in North Korea would be the chief director of Kwak Chul-hee. Kwak is the chief representative of the 16th UNC and North Korean military negotiations in 2009.
Both sides should focus on the repatriation process during the talks. As denuclearization negotiations in North America are not as fast as expected, the problem of repatriation, described as "good will", is meaningless since it will be 39, another measure to improve North American relations.
In addition to the question of the repatriation of remains, it is possible that the question of the establishment of a peace regime on the Korean peninsula is evoked in a comprehensive way, since North proposed as a high level negotiation. North Korea has usually pointed out the issue of US troops stationed in the United States and developed strategic badets in the United States regarding respect for the armistice agreement during interviews high level with the UNC, but there is no direct question on this issue. This is an badysis.
A research committee member of the Hongmin Institute for Unification Research said: "The high-level talks between the UNC and the North Korean representatives of Panmunjom are the most important discussions on the armistice. " There is also the possibility of referring to the problem to be solved, "he said, adding:" If general discussions take place, it is also significant that there is a possibility that A channel to discuss military matters between North Korea and the United States be launched. "
[email protected] [19659010]! Function (f, b, e, v, n, t, s ) {
if (f.fbq) returns; n = f.fbq = function () {n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply (n, arguments): n.queue.push (arguments)}; if (! f._fbq) f._fbq = n;
n.push = n; n.loaded =! 0; n.version = 2.0 & # 39 ;; n.queue = []; t = b.createElement (e); t.async =! 0;
t.src = v; s = b.getElementsByTagName (e) [0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore (t, s)
} (window, document, script, // connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js');
fbq (& # 39 ;, & # 39; 712739455529100 & # 39;);
fbq (& # 39; track & # 39 ;, "PageView");
[ad_2]
Source link
