[ad_1]
Dramatic dialogue with the United States
President Donald Trump told reporters that he could discuss with Iran on the basis of hostile sanctions against Iran.
His prediction came at a cautious prospect that Iran could respond dramatically.
The United States has planned superpowers and sanctions against Iran, and given Iran's severe economic difficulties, the Iranian government will negotiate with the United States as North Korea.
The so-called "currency" in Iran that anticipates such a reversal takes the case of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the chief Iranian leader during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s.
L & # 39; Ayatollah Khomeini is trying to fight the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein It is the Iranian internal interpretation that he wanted to go to the negotiating table in the end although the people's wish has become more more depressed.
In response to the determination of this Ayatollah Khomeini, Iran says: "I drank a poisonous cup."
Sitting at the negotiating table with the United States of America as the supreme leader in Iran is a poisonous and painful decision. Iran maintains the spirit of the 1979 Islamic Revolution as a national state, which abolished the pro-Western and pro-Western monarchy.
It is an encouraging observation that senior leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei may finally make the decision to drink a poisoned drink to avoid the economic hardship that it causes in a crisis of life. extreme confrontation with the United States.
As the stability of the regime is shaken when US sanctions are ruined by US sanctions, only negotiations with the United States will be a breakthrough in economic hardships.
At this time, however, the prospect that, unlike North Korea, the United States will not resist dialogue and will not respond to dialogue,
While North Korea sees a young and new leader (Kim Jong Eun, President of the State Council) pushing change as a normal nation, the highest presbytery in Iran, which has established political and economic interests during last 30 years, is the culmination of power.
Both sides have maintained the legitimacy of the regime on anti-American lines, but given the position of leading supporters, Iran has much less flexibility or justification to change these existing central routes.
Iran is much more complicated than the DPRK in the interests of the power structure and central interests.
Negotiations with the United States must be decided by the supreme leader, and they will face opposition and criticism from conservative Iranian conservative anti-American military and religious forces.
Anti-Iranian extremist experts are waiting for physical "civil war" conflicts to occur in the middle of power as soon as senior leaders approve renegotiation with the United States.
The external circumstances surrounding Iran are also different from those of North Korea.
North Korea is warmly welcomed by Korea, China, Russia and Japan as mediators, at least on the surface, to support the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula, North Korea and peaceful negotiations.
On the other hand, Israel, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Bahrain around Iran are worsening relations with the United States to become Iran.
They are active allies in American politics in the Middle East and are allies in the purchase of arms in large quantities.
In addition, Iran was deeply involved in Syria, the biggest problem of the Middle East, the civil war in Yemen, the anguish of the correction in Iraq and the Palestinian conflict.
Although the Barack Obama government has conducted nuclear negotiations solely for Iran's nuclear activities, the Trump government is trying to resolve all the outstanding issues of the Middle East, related to Iran, in a unanimous concession of Iran.
This means that the possibility of a dialogue with Iran is low
The condition of the renegotiation proposed by the United States to Iran is also very severe for the United States. ;Iran.
The United States demanded that Pyongyang virtually suspend its operations in Syria, Yemen, Lebanon and other facilities, including suspending the development of ballistic missiles.
North Korea stated that it would guarantee the system as an advantage against denuclearization, but it urged Iran to defend the internal public uprising, which clearly showed the goal ultimate change of diet.
This "acclaim" of the United States on the anti-government opinion in Iran is perceived as an impure intervention of foreign powers and is counterproductive. The stigma of "pro-Americanism" in Iran is still the lack of public support.
(Tehran-Yonhap News) Correspondent of Kang Hoon Sang
Source link
