"The core is the noble heritage of the fleet, and if there is no death!" : Monthly shipbuilding

Graphic = Chosun DB

North Korea stated that she could not give up nuclear weapons. Recently, a lecturer from the North Korean authorities to an executive committee of North Hamgyong Province told participants that "Nuclear weapons are the legacy left by navy commanders.

Based on source sources, "Free Asia Broadcasting" (FRG) said on October 24, "The officers who attended the meeting mean that the top" I did not know if it was a strategic reminder to increase the bargaining power in the process of abandoning nuclear weapons, "he said, refraining from answering and calmly listening." [19659003] This caucus met in early July in the Party Committee of North Hamkyung Province for party secretaries and managers of the judiciary, social organizations and enterprises of the province (the North Korean word for the company "It was a meeting." It was the position of the North Korean authorities to communicate the central policy regarding the situation created both inside and out. outside the US-North Korean talks.

The event broke out at the end of the meeting. The speaker who appeared at the last order of the six-hour conference was a paradox that "nuclear power is an indispensable legacy of the fleet". The source said: "The content of this meeting is causing a considerable social unrest, as people are aware of it," he said, "there is a reaction between the authorities' empathy and the destruction of A promise to the international community. "He said.

Another source said: "This is the first time that after the Singapore meeting, the official declaration of nuclear power as a noble legacy inherited by former rulers has been carried out by a party cadre in the center.However, he also said that "it can be one of the ideological education projects to catch all cadres who have been unhappy because of the recent situation."

The North Korean government of Tae Young Ho did not believe in Kim Jong Eun's nuclear surrender, Tae Kwon said at a ceremony of publication of the book "Pbadword of the Secretary of the Third "In May:" North Korea's conclusion will not be a complete nuclear dismantling but a nuclear-free nuclear power. "At the October 20 plenary session of the Labor Party Central Committee, Kim Jong Eun set out the concept from a "powerful sword ante "and" solid security "for the North Korean nuclear problem," he said. He said.

North Korea spends 24% of its national budget on military spending, stating: "In the opening speech of the International Conference on Human Rights in Korea, North in the same month, It seems that nuclear weapons are essential. "

North Korea's obsession with nuclear weapons is deeply rooted." Now, after talks between North Korea and South Korea and the United States, North Korea is in full swing emancipation, but only two years ago, North Korea attacked South Korea.This is a testimony of the fact that he possesses nuclear weapons.

According to the Impact of Improvement and response to North Korean nuclear development released by the Korean Institute for National Unification in 2016, North Korea's nuclear posture has become the most aggressive since the 39th. Kim Jong Eun Regime: We Reinforce the Missile Capacity to Mount a Nuclear Warhead, and We're Also Studying Technology to Miniaturize Nuclear Warheads

North Korea's Considered US-ROK Combined Training in the Past as a provocation and continues to reveal that it will destroy the preemptive strike by using nuclear weapons. On March 27, 2013, just after the third nuclear test, the Korean People's Armed Forces issued a statement entitled "Combat Stance No. 1" and "Military Action (South) includes a strong nuclear strike to protect our sovereignty." . The book explains:

<Despite the fact that the North Korean regime lays down the principle of the use of nuclear weapons that are only limited when nuclear weapons are used for deterrence and retaliation, North Korean authorities threaten the nuclear pre-emptive strike against Korea.

North Korea examined the attitudes of the Korean-American regime in the past and presented denuclearization as a bargaining card. When each government took a determined stance, it threatened with a pre-emptive nuclear weapon attack. Can we believe in the "denuclearization theory" of their admiration?

Written by Shin Sung Min Chosun's Monthly Reporter