Putin's Real Meaning and the Brief Meeting: What the President of the United States Could Have Promised in a Closed Door

World



[ad_1]

The President of the United States criticized the media for D. Shortly for his tone, his general attitude towards meetings with NATO leaders and his frustrations with the United States. speech he uttered. during bilateral talks with Vladimir Putin. The latest US president believes in a perfect deal and within four hours may have changed relations between America and Russia at the time of Barack Obama's administration.

What was the DPRK exactly in agreement with the Russian president? Is the Kremlin leader facing a so-called compromise against him? The owner of the White House was really the owner of Western treasures, issued the Baltic States, Ukraine and even the diplomats of his country.

Such badumptions have not yet been found in the Western media and after the trip to justify and disdain evil. Nevertheless, controversial statements made by the same D. It is not a coincidence that it is not a coincidence that this has caused a great discussion about the future of relations between the United States and their allies in Europe. But the blatant remarks and rumors about D. Short and his environmental ties with Russia seem to be an indestructible gaffe on the overall negative badessment of the US presidential meetings: it has turned out to be extremely poor.

Evaluated Short Performance: Liquid

The Lithuanian diplomat, former Foreign Minister and former Ambbadador to the United States and EU representative in Russia, Vygaudas Ušackas, who spoke at from the DELFI TV conference, no doubt about it. He reiterated his previously stated idea that, at least in the bilateral talks between Putin and D. At the brief meeting, the latter, in terms of tennis, said that the whole was defeated sec: 0 – 6 Why such an badessment? key partners in security. I regret that in Helsinki, instead of this brave, determined and short-term, we saw a person who applauded Putin, who did not raise important issues – the annexation of Crimea , the war in Ukraine, the violation of human rights and democratic norms in Russia. On the contrary, he expressed doubts about US intelligence revealing the interference of Russia, and this is the result, "stressed Ušackas

admitting that the worst-case scenario, called" Second Yalta " did not take place.The agreement between the Allies and the Soviet Union in Yalta after the end of the Second World War in Europe, where was determined the destiny of Europe's East

"It is undoubtedly unknown what was said at the two-hour bilateral meeting. But I know how these meetings are prepared: one is confidential conversations, the other is what you say publicly.


Putin's Real Meaning and the Brief Meeting: What the President of the United States Could Have Promised in a Closed Door

© DELFI / Domantas Pipas

Maybe If we plan ahead, we'll see may -be the results because it can not be said that the US administration has become a nightmare because there are defense plans, greater operational readiness and an increase in troops in Afghanistan. He is a rival and unifying leader, "said V. Ušackas, criticizing D. Trump, pointing out that the appearance of such an American president was the first in 70 years, during which it was usual for US leaders to badume the unifying role of the West.

] Do not look at the speeches but the works

Another TV interviewer – MP, Homeland Union – Member of the Christian Democrats Lithuanians and the Committee on National Security and Defense Laurynas Kasčiūnas urged not to criticize D. Trump alone L. Kasciun believes that it is necessary to look not only the rhetoric of the President of the United States, but also his real work, which does not free Russia from concessions

"Indeed, what you say is important, but especially what you do.The next day after Helsinki – a message of about 200 million. Defense needs of Ukraine. e think we have not understood well what is the short concept.


Putin's true meaning and the brief meeting: what the President of the United States could have promised in a closed door

© DELFI / Rimas Pocius

Rhetoric may have failed, but it is practical : The European Disaster Reduction Budget will provide us with a significant portion of the funding gap for air defenses and will also modernize the air bases in Estonia, Hungary and Slovakia in the United States.

Yes, rhetoric can be considered weaker. Since the end of the Cold War, he has increased the military involvement of the United States in Europe

when one bends his fingers for his interest, they will have more figures ", – L. Kasciun again refused to conclude with V. Ušackas, better when the rhetoric fits in. But again, I take practical actions, not rhetoric .. I heard a lot of nice words from Obama, but I l & rsquo; I heard from Medvedev (in late March 2012, Russian President Medvedev responded to Obama's promise that the United States would more flexibly deal with bilateral disagreements, including the missile defense system in Europe if he will be re-elected in November – Red.)


Dmitry Medvedev and Barack Obama

Dmitry Medvedev and Barack Obama

Then we did not make much noise, but now some mistakes look like the end of the world. The short estimates are highly ideologized and the couc he liberal attempts to blame Trump's entire responsibility through ideological glbades, "said L. Kasčiūnas and again received strong reactions from the interlocutor. Laurynes, laughing, if you try to court with Reagan, thank God for having a professional team of the American administration. But we can not ignore the short words, because the final decisions are made by the President ", – V. Ušackas vilified

Solutions not in accordance with the provisions

Opinion of interlocutors DELFI TV on D A short break for several other occasions V. Ušackas, who criticized the parliamentarian's statements, pointed out that the decisions taken by D. Trump were not in keeping with his own political values ​​or positions, particularly on the merits of so-called "professionals" present at the Pentagon, Congress, State Department and other institutions.

"They forced a brief abandonment of Russia's sanctions to be more favorable to Europe," said Ušackas, and received another remark from L. Kasciuno: who had appointed advisors like Herbert MacMaster, John Bolton or James Mantis, the Pentagon's leader, Putin's true meaning and the brief meeting: what the President of the United States could have promised in camera ” width=”580″/>

© Sputnik / Scanpix

"But his public decisions after consultation with advisers, cross American and European cooperation D. Short creates a drama Here, I would like to quote Ronald Kessler who writes that D. Trump wants to show friendship, reduce tension, communicate, but in At the same time, it makes the interviewers uncomfortable.

It is part of his strategy that the partners obey him, and he behaves, as in negotiations, on the principle of honey and honey. A meeting in Helsinki, this strategy has turned into a principle of honey, "Ušackas has not denied.

The fact that D. Trump sends his message to the public (there will be no unnecessary confrontation with Russia,, and the real policy is happening in his own way, is being noticed by more and more of 39, experts, pointing out that stability is provided by D. Shortly badembled team of closest companions who often disagree with his radical rhetoric.

However, according to L. Kasciunu, it is mostly in Europe that one too often wants to see the negatives badociated with D. Few related factors that led to the emergence of the # 39, anti-Americanism on the Old Continent and create a certain agenda. "George W. Bush, the old and the new Europe, was a unilateral policy directed against some Western countries, and we opened the door to NATO.I do not say that repression in the transatlantic relationship is good, but when geopolitical combinations emerge and the United States is our partner, there may be a chance to look for a benefit, some rhetoric can catalyze the factors, but we are not blaming it, some processes are over. " , according to L. Kasčiūnas

According to him, D. Trumpas was the reason behind the NATO reforms, the commitments made by the members of the Alliance in Europe.

There has a controversy between the two conservatives in the studio DELFI TV, which is nevertheless worthy of D. The brief rhetoric and its influence have also become rather non-diplomatic comparisons. "Former Ambbadador V. Ušackas did not not spared the picturesque epithets D. For a brief appearance in Helsinki.

"His actions worry me a lot, his communication is crossed by the trust of American and European leaders, the behavior is musical with the elements of Bollywood diplomacy."

Moreover, his appearances create a certain mood in America. If a year ago, 65% Americans spoke for NATO, now this number has dropped to 40%. D. Shortly, in their messages, even the republican opinion changes – 80%. they believe that Helsinki has succeeded

These facts send a signal that Europe and Lithuania can not accept that the US collective agreement commitments will be implemented during the brief presidency, "said Ušackas V. Angela Merkel, Donald Trump and other leaders of the G-7 ” width=”580″/>

Angela Merkel, Donald Trump and other leaders of the G-7

The latest thesis on the apparent threat of commitments Americans to protect his allies was repeated several times that he was responsible for his presidential election as a diplomat, spoke with the US leader, who had previously issued his statements in liquid form, and publicly questioned the promises of the administration in the short term to fulfill its obligations under the NATO treaty 5th article, V. Ušackas ensured that first of all, it is necessary to talk between e ux and no

According to V. Ušackas, the essential thing now is to take care of his defense: to invest 2% or even 4%. The BVP defends the country and makes contacts with American politicians – influential members of Congress, the administration, the Pentagon, other structures, the community of badysts. Admittedly, the former Foreign Minister hesitated to advise the Lithuanian public: "We must be more subtle, show intelligent diplomacy, realize the reality without being paranoid, have a nightmare, the end of the world, like some young people. diplomats do not say it. We must badyze the situation with firmness and serenity, "said V. Ušackas

Kasčiūnas recalled that D. Short speeches were to be considered as a call that" awoke the Europeans who died in pacifism and the end of the war. " History ", V. Ušackas once again led to D. Trump

" Laurynai, I agree. he will speak more, it will be useless, especially in Germany. No US president has expressed distrust in the exploration of his country without questioning Article 5 of NATO.

Therefore, we must work with Republicans and Democrats, and those who refused short appointments, we must work with them, invest in our defense, strengthen alliances in Europe and help Germany, the the most powerful country in Europe. We can not take security for granted, "said Ušackas

at that time, according to L. Kasciun, such badessments may be too hasty, although they recognize that it is necessary to speak with the Americans. you must use all possible formats. For example, on August 25 Valdas Adamkus, a large number of Americans coming to Lithuania, Zygmunt Pavilion tries to add them to our concerns, "said Kasčiūnas, recalling the comparison of the famous American badyst Robert Kagan, which involves Europeans of the more peaceful Venus and the Americans of militant Marx.

It is this last approach that best suits the Kremlin, looking more karing in the world to understand how Russia works, how to dialogue rely on.

D The memoir goes on to understand it, and the problem of the Europeans is simple: their vision of the world of security is different, they live at the end of history. It is better not to confront Russia, and Russia understands that and does better to the Kremlin to lie to the Europeans than to a rigorous America.

Wolf Diplomacy Notes

"The United States is important for us to divide Western leaders rather than focus as before, so the consequences can be long-lasting, because part of American society is doomed to Europe.Well, let's talk about 2%, Nord Stream, but can we trust him? "- V. Ušackas insulted ruthlessly, turning away from the direct question of not to trust D. Briefly, but once again doubted his decision logic.

He also advised to be careful with the wolf's interview of the American diplomacy, former secretary of state and national security advisor. Henry Kissinger

This last interviewer said that the meeting between D. Trump and Putin was necessary, and that the West was taken for an attitude towards Russia, naively believing that the Kremlin would play according to Western rules. Nevertheless, according to Kissinger, "it is precisely D. Short who can be the historical figure that marks the end of the time, even without realizing it". Moreover, according to H. Kissinger, it would be ironic that it was precisely the Europeans who did not like that D. Short seriously concerned them in their own defense.

"I respect the opinion of H. Kissinger, I spoke to him every year after several occasions.But let's not forget that he comes from a similar camp, like a small that says that we must communicate with Russia, define the areas of influence, his statement confirms my doubts and concerns about a new phenomenon of transaction at the expense of other countries. Ušackas

Admittedly, he admits himself to have proposed to change Lithuania's relations with Russia: it is necessary to prepare Putin's withdrawal, to support democratic movements and political forces, and to communicate with Russia. But at the same time realize that "Lithuania will not change Russia", although it will remain in its neighbor. "We must invest in the future, we are and will remain neighbors, Kaliningrad is an area of ​​danger and opportunity," said Ušackas. Kasčiūnas's remarks that Lithuania, unlike the big states, were more likely to communicate with Russia because of its uneven geopolitical weight, and the Kremlin's proposed exchanges could be more dangerous than, for example, the agreements between Russia and the United States.

It is strictly forbidden to use the information published by DELFI on other sites, in the media or elsewhere or to distribute our material in any form without consent, and if consent is obtained, it is necessary to Indicate DELFI as the source.

[ad_2]
Source link

Tags

Powered by https://naaju.com/lithuania | Designed by Naaju
© Copyright 2024, All Rights Reserved