[ad_1]
Everyone who has spent time in Sydney will recognize the iconic attraction and much appreciated.
For many, this evokes memories of nausea-inducing rides and fairy-tales, but it could end for the historic, Harborside Luna Park after a historic court ruling – blasted as "terrible" by his owner.
The Land and Environment Court ruled that the amusement park – which has delighted Australians and tourists since 1935 – could not install a new The devastating judgment means that the fair must submit to a process of development request whenever it moves or replaces rides.
This means that local residents can complain about the potential noise of a ride and their objections would be considered part of the application process.
Addressing Fairfax, Park Chief Executive Peter Hearne said the decision brought the company to his knees.
"We are deeply disappointed by this decision, which places a big question mark on the long-term viability of one of Sydney's best-known and most-loved destinations," said M Hearne. "Luna Park, which attracts more than a million tourists a year, announced last March that it would inject $ 20 million into improvements over the next four years.
Improvements have promised six new high-tech maneuvers and updates to Luna Park classics, such as Coney Island, The Rotor, Ferris Wheel and The Wild Mouse roller coaster
Mr. Hearne said The Daily Telegraph The new rides will be designed for thrill seekers and will use virtual reality and other technologies.
"The experience needs to be refreshed," said Hearne.
The first of the new rides, the flying carousel, was supposed to be the centerpiece of a "family zone" designed to attract people with young children.
However, a certificate of construction of the attraction was rej been issued by the certifying authority four days after its filing in March 2017. [19659003] "The works can not be demonstrated as not inconsistent with the development consents because it was not known if the developments allow for the development." installation of new rides, "said the authority.
According to Fairfax, Luna Park Sydney Pty Ltd. took NSW Anthony Roberts to court after supporting the rejection of the claim by the certifier.
The Minister rejected the assertion of the amusement park that the first of the three phases of the Luna Park planning bylaw meant that new rides could be installed without permission. development. Mr. Roberts won the case and Interim Judge Simon Molesworth stated that the park owners did not understand that the consent of step 1 "could or allowed the use of the land without approving the work allowing these uses ".
Luna Park – built with the Art Deco architecture of the 1930s – opened October 4, 1935, based on the first Lu na Park that opened in Coney Island, New York in 1903.
American entrepreneur Herman Phillips introduced the idea to Australia and opened Luna Park in Melbourne in 1912 and Luna Park Glenelg, Adelaide in 1930.
Despite initial success, the Sydney attraction was destined to be transformed into a multi-storey mall in the 1960s. However, the offer was unsuccessful.
In 1979, a tragic ghost train fire, which claimed the lives of six children, forced the closure of the attraction until 1982, when it reopened under a new name and new owners. However, the amusement park closed again in 1988 for renovation after an unsuccessful attempt to redevelop the site as an adult entertainment center.
In 2002, Luna Park Sydney Pty Ltd obtained a 40-year lease for the attraction and reopened in 2004 after a lengthy renovation.
In February 2010, the amusement park was entered in the NSW Heritage Register.
Source link
