[ad_1]
However, the first arguments he will hear in an abortion-related case will not address restrictions on the procedure. At the same time, the court has been delaying for months a decision on whether to directly challenge Roe deer – a Mississippi ban on abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, which lower courts have blocked.
The case of Kentucky: The case, Cameron v. EMW Women’s Surgical Center, concerns Kentucky’s 2018 ban on a common method of surgical abortion used after 15 weeks of pregnancy. The law was signed by former Republican Gov. Matt Bevin, but was blocked by lower federal courts.
Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron, a Republican, is seeking to defend the law in court after Democratic Governor Andy Beshear’s administration refused. The 6th Circuit rejected Cameron’s request, prompting him to appeal to the Supreme Court for the right to intervene.
Cameron also called on justices to reconsider the constitutionality of Kentucky law in light of a recent Supreme Court that conservatives say could pave the way for more limits on the process. Although a narrowly divided Supreme Court in this case, June Medical v. Russian, hit a Louisiana law regulating abortion clinics, the concurring opinion of Chief Justice John Roberts indicated that federal courts could uphold restrictions on abortion that had no medical justification as long as they were not too onerous for them. the patients.
However, the court said it would only hear arguments on the narrower procedural issue of whether Cameron can intervene in the case and not whether the 6th Circuit decision should be overturned.
What it could mean: If the judges side with Cameron, it could open the door for more state officials to defend abortion laws when their governors choose not to. A hearing in the case will likely take place later this year.
[ad_2]
Source link