Sparrow bank in blue acacia – South East



[ad_1]

  Tax authorities estimate that the bank deducted 1 million NOK for non-deductible expenses

The tax authorities state that the bank deducted one million NOK for costs that are not deductible.

Sölvesborg -Mjällby Sparbank ended up in a huge blue sword. Tax authorities say the bank has made a deduction of SEK million for costs that are not deductible.

There seems to be a "group trip" far abroad, wreaths, tickets to rock concerts, and so on. The management of the bank does not intend to appeal, even if it considers that it complies with the applicable rules. Instead, it is thought that in the future, this will go in the direction of the interpretation of the tax agency.

Of course, the management of savings banks showed that "we knew we were wrong"

. That's why no one is interested in profits. It is both an opportunity and a danger. The risk is great because someone wants additional benefits. Is the salary of a director of more than 1.4 million Swedish kroner plus paid premiums of nearly 0.7 million Swedish kroner reasonable? Compared with senior municipal officials, such as municipal councilors, who receive about half the salary, the question will be asked.

The municipalities name the so-called chief executive officers. Sölvesborg names 23, Bromölla 2. These are chosen quite proportionally. In Sölvesborg, the social democrats are strong, so there are many social democrats among the main peoples. Many members of parliament and council are included. Nevertheless, there is never a report to the municipal council on the functioning of the bank.

These 25 people appoint 25 other leaders. Here, the political connection is not so strong. However, the municipal council of the municipality belongs to this group.

The 50 chiefs appoint the council. It is the directors who approve the annual report at the meeting and release the board. "Ordinary people" can not attend the meeting and ask questions.

There can be scratches, but the main sessions are usually described as wet and expensive events. Again: The bank has no interest of own benefit. We can have fun without it being affected.

The annual report was submitted around April 1st. I did not find any suggestion that the bank had business with tax authorities. The auditors, who still have arrears of half a million, seem to have had no objections to the case.

There appear to have been public objections to some well-discussed "parallel activities". Nevertheless: Finally, any disappointed customer realizes that the bank has crossed the border. That is always the knowledge of the tax authority. Then it's cut. In many nationwide savings banks, boards of directors may have sleep problems. The Swedish Tax Agency should follow the matter also with other banks

Let me guess that any party in Sölvesborg chooses to kick the current principal and then the council . They dragged a skate skate on the municipality. The CEO can be left behind. It costs two million to buy it.

Sune Håkansson

[ad_2]
Source link