[ad_1]
The Annual Report of the Data Protection Officer is no longer physically distributed.
The debate in the Cantonal Council on their significance remained
The Cantonal Council of 5 July dealt, inter alia, with the annual report of the Zug Data Protection Officer. (Image: Stefan Kaiser (Zug, February 22, 2018))
The Kantonsrat Rischer Kurt Balmer (CVP) is always good for a surprise. A year ago, for example, during the processing of the Cantonal Banks Act, he filed the idea that the canton could sell its shares to this bank. In yesterday's cantonal council debate, Balmer marked the new director of data protection in Zug (1 January 2019) for Yvonne Bettina Jöhri: "The data protection office, including the new delegate to the Data protection, must recognize Of course, the red pencil is used. "The institution" will of course not be questioned. "
The cantonal councilor Chamer Esther Haas (Alternative-dien Greens / ALG ) focuses on the activity report of the protection delegate Where is the independence of data protection if the cantonal authorities are involved in data protection oversight? Ennetsee's ALG parliamentarian thinks that the ice is thin: "We must be careful to respect the legal principles of data protection to save money" Haas concludes that there "is no more" 39 savings in data protection [toléré]
Savings in data protection, even counterproductive?
Hubert Schuler (Hünenberg), PS representative, reprimanded: "In our opinion, it is unreasonable that the concerns of federal administrations or regulations are not respected." According to Schuler, this gap is not the responsibility of the current data protection officer, Claudia Mund. Instead, Schuler shows his colleagues in the lobby with his virtual finger. The cantonal council had unconsciously reduced the budget. However, nothing has been won, continues Hünenberger: "We are firmly convinced that these savings will result in higher costs in the future."
Data Protection Officer Zug Claudia Mund
(1965: 1212) Markus Hürlimann (SVP / Baar) contradicts this: "We should rather question the digital trend, slow down if necessary and not participate in all that is euphoric and naive Hürlimann is also concerned about whether the data protection center in Zug had 39, a sufficient staff.The data protection is granted 160 percentage points.The canton of Lucerne is worth 90% privacy.Hürlimann mentions this in context, because the current data protection Claudia mouth for reasons of resources was lifted for the first time on the submission of contributions in judicial and administrative practice.Otherwise, on other statements, the data protectionist had to Do not go for the same reason. Among other things in terms of video surveillance. In the end, the mouth gets applause from the board anyway. The carrot and the whip, that is what the Cantonal Council understands.
Source link
