Commoners say yes: the rose garden tunnel is more expensive – Zurich – Limmattal



[ad_1]

The Cantonal Council of Zurich shows a clear yes to the rose garden project. The project, which aims to calm the district Stadtzürcher Wipkingen district with tunnels and tram lines, is supported by the bourgeois parties. The two commissions in charge of affairs at the Cantonal Council met for one year and announced their results yesterday. The commissions for planning and construction as well as for energy, traffic and the environment for the rose garden project each voted in favor of 10 to 5.

The decisive factor was the approval of the SVP, which was still critical at first. Your argument then: A billion francs for a section of 600 meters, that's too much. All the more so as the township and the municipalities have paid for a product that ultimately benefits only one district of the city of Zurich – and the traffic problem remains unresolved

provided that the capacity on the # 39 axis Rosengarten be maintained please have now approved the project. As for the FDP, which was from the beginning, SVP now exceeds the benefits – for residents, but also for commuters and trades in fast-growing economic areas of Zurich, Glattal and Limmattal.

Security wants the UDC with an additional intermediate lane, on the section between Milchbuck and Bucheggplatz. This will better separate oncoming traffic, writes the SVP. The third lane could be used in accidents and maintenance work. It therefore protects the Rosengarten district from avoidance traffic.

The additional track makes the project more expensive by 70 million francs. This brings the total cost to 1.1 billion francs. Very good, the SVP is not. This amount is considerable, she wrote in her opinion.

"Civic Concrete Heads"

That the UDC mainly occupies the safety and well-being of the neighborhood residents, you do not buy the MS. from. On the contrary, the SVP aims at an expansion of capacity. In its submission, the SP reacted strongly to the majority vote of the Commission. She speaks of "right-hand concrete heads" and "self-ideologues" who use the rose garden with a third way as "another well-developed axis of incidence in the city of Zurich".

The connection to the tram is supported only as a necessary evil. Instead of improving the quality of life and living in Wipkingen and directing traffic around the city, more cars have threatened to drive through. According to the SP, the gates at Wipkingerplatz and Bucheggplatz could accommodate twice the volume of the Gotthard tunnel. The Commission rejected its request to cover car traffic from the rose garden to its current level of 56 000 vehicles per day

Parallel to the PS, the Greens, Greens and AL also criticized the decision taken yesterday . Faced with climate change and the high pollution by particles and CO2, the Greens call for a more progressive transport policy. It is interesting to note that more than one billion Swiss francs would be spent on 600 meters, while the cantonal roads of a total length of 700 kilometers are still not cleaned – contrary to the objectives of the cantonal program of Noise reduction that ends this year. This inadequacy is outright an affront to the noisy population of the Canton of Zurich

Inconstitutional

For cost-benefit reasons, GLP rejects the project. Instead, it calls for an underground public transport connection. Because the planned Rosengarten streetcar would probably be unconstitutional anyway

Reason was the counter-proposal to the anti-congestion initiative, approved by the voting population of Zurich last September. Since then, capacity restrictions are only possible on the higher level road network if alternate capacities are created at the same time. This principle is violated in the rose garden project, writes the GLP. Because before the traffic lights of Wipkingerplatz would be necessary for the change of way of the trams.

Because of these restrictions, the objections threatened to prevent the project.
Be that as it may, the VCS Zurich is against the project. It's "absurd and absurd" and causes the opposite of a reduction in traffic. On Wipkingerplatz entire rows of houses and on Albisriederplatz, a demolished stop would be demolished.

If the case is to be handled at the Cantonal Council this autumn and accepted by the bourgeois majority, the VCS wants to take the referendum. In any case, voters in Zurich will vote on the project next year. The tunnel should be completed by 2030.

[ad_2]
Source link