[ad_1]
Marcel Gyr
Initiator of the Self-Determination Initiative: Hans-Ueli Vogt. (Image: Christoph Ruckstuhl / NZZ)
In the debate on self – determination initiative, emphasis has been put here on the European Convention on Human Rights. Human Rights (ECHR), which is at most in conflict with state law. More than four months before the vote of 25 November, the economic umbrella organization Economiesuisse warned Tuesday at a press conference that the initiative of SVP had also touched some 600 economic agreements. This creates enormous legal uncertainty, which is a shame for Switzerland as a business.
Christine Kaufmann, Professor of Public Law, International and European Law at the University of Zurich, spoke about one of the most demanding initiatives. "It's complicated," says herself who recently issued an opinion on the possible effects. As a point of disagreement are not clearly defined formulations or even those that contradict each other.
Kaufmann concludes that in the adoption of the initiative, a number of international treaties should be renegotiated. If these negotiations fail, this could lead to termination. This would affect not only contracts with the European Union as the agreement on the free movement of people, but also hundreds of bilateral economic contracts, including the free trade agreement with China.
It is completely uncertain that the contracting party is willing to renegotiate. In any case, the adoption of the initiative would weaken confidence in the Swiss economic place. According to Kaufmann, the willingness to negotiate new contracts with Switzerland in the face of lasting legal uncertainty would be undermined. Due to the retroactive clause, the threat of termination would affect both existing and future contracts, since neither free trade nor Switzerland is subject to referendum.
The purpose of the SVP and Professor Hans-Ueli Vogt The conflict between national law and international law is not achieved. On the contrary, assuming a new legal uncertainty provoked, his colleague counts. Jan Atteslander, head of external economic policy at Economiesuisse, also warns against the deterioration of an operational system without adversity.
According to Atteslanders, Switzerland would weaken unnecessarily and lose its reputation as a reliable entrepreneur. Their image as an extremely attractive business location would be compromised and make future free trade agreements much more difficult. He sees the automatic problem of checking existing contracts as problematic. Instead, Atteslander pleads for dissatisfaction with a specific contract to make this subject available.
In the next battle of voting wants the Economic Umbrella Association, which claims to represent 100,000 companies with about 2 million workers, joins the large camp. Given the threatening effects on economic policy, Economiesuisse considers that the fight against the initiative of self-determination is central.
Source link
