[ad_1]
Frank Urbaniok is one of Zurich's best known psychiatrists. He has made national and international headlines again and again. The 56-year-old man has headed the Psychiatric Psychiatric Service (DPP) of the Cantonal Department of Corrections for more than 21 years. Now, he resigns because of a serious illness, as announced by the Office of the Commissioner yesterday.
In 1995, when he was appointed chief and deputy physician, the staff performed his therapies with the detainees as he saw fit. In 2003, Urbaniok wrote in his book on delinquents: "What are they for human beings, what can we do?" The treatment reports would have consisted of only a few lines. Some colleagues did not want to make any prognostic statement or did not train for it
after the murder of Zollikerberg in 1993. At that time, Erich Hauert, convicted of two sexual murders, raped and killed a young man. Pfadgeführerin on leave of absence. The murder shocked Switzerland and highlighted the practice of therapy and prognosis at that time as well as the treatment of criminals incurable or extremely dangerous
Practiced in private practice
Urbaniok had the PPD as "A leading international institution in the field of forensic psychiatry has developed," writes Jerome Endrass, for many years one of his closest collaborators and today's Chief of Staff at the Prison Department, in a statement. Due to its strong media presence, Urbaniok has become a public figure in Switzerland. He reformed the treatment of offenders by taking a crime-based approach and systematically focusing on the prevention of other crimes.
The management of the Psychiatric and Psychological Service resumes on August 1, 2018 Matthias Stürm and Michael Braunschweig. Urbaniok will work in the future in its own practice and will continue to work scientifically. In the DPL, he will only collaborate selectively, whether for expert reports or client care.
Urbaniok has published many important scientific articles. He was first a professor at the University of Zurich and was later appointed honorary professor of the University of Constance. Last year, the Swiss Society of Legal Psychology honored him for the work of his life
Offenders as Experts
At the Heart of His Work were the Fotres that he developed: the Operationalized Therapeutic Risk Assessment System. It is a diagnostic system that captures the risks posed by a person, as well as therapeutic opportunities. Central to his philosophy was the so-called deliktzentrierte therapy, in which he reformed the usual type of therapy for a long time and focused steadily on the prevention of other crimes. At the center of therapy were no longer primarily serious biographical events or the treatment of a difficult childhood, but meticulous scrutiny of one's own act. Offenders should become experts in their own actions.
The influence and influence of Urbaniok were not devoid of criticism. It came on the one hand from the successful authors and their lawyers, on the other hand from other psychiatrists. If convicts refuse to participate in a court-ordered therapeutic measure, they must take into account that the prison office refuses to grant them release or conditional dismissals – such as the recently released bank robber Hugo Portmann who refused to do it until the end of his sentence. to do therapy and spent decades in prison. Critics say that custody and hospitalization measures have massively increased. Urbaniok and his associates proclaim the promise of salvation for delinquents who claim to be absolute and act as judges.
Success proved just Urbaniok. A second case Hauert did not exist in the canton of Zurich – unlike the Romandie, where the murders committed by convicted sex offenders in the social therapist Adeline 2013 in Geneva and Marie in Payerne VD 19 years were causing the 39 horror and raised questions about the penal system. The Urbaniok philosophy is now entered the professional world and its system is also being developed in other cantons.
Jacqueline Fehr (SP), Zurich government advisor and legal director, summarizes yesterday on Twitter: "Urbaniok is uncompromising for the essentials" Speaking of the offenses that shaped forensic psychiatry like no one else. "
"I was the enfant terrible"
Mr. Urbaniok, how are you today in health?
I'm starting to plan my life again. But cancer has not left me without a trace and the future is of course associated with much more uncertainty than before. After more than twenty years in an exposed position, it's time to slow down my work pace. I do not quarrel with fate. On the one hand, I know that many people are facing similar situations. On the other hand, even before the illness, I had thought about taking a shorter career.
They were in the spotlight. How did you treat it?
I was the terrible child of psychiatry and justice for some. The fact that we had to lock up the whole life of the extremely small group of extremely dangerous offenders was at that time a scandalous point of view. I've been heavily criticized for being described as a ruthless uncompromising. Other people blamed me for the delinquent pampering because I used therapies to prevent them from relapsing after their release.
Are you a Conservative or a Judge?
Neither one nor the other, the other. It is important for me to understand exactly each individual case and then act appropriately in this particular and proportionate case. It takes great care. Above all, there is no room for prejudices or right-left ideologies. The criticism, often violent and personal, is weakened for several years
So no hardening?
No, not at all. I've always loved work. Without a doubt, it also has dark sides in the form of a growing bureaucracy on one side and awful mails and threats from the other. The burden was in part enormous. But that's part of it, as are many other public leaders. At least, I was able to keep my family away from everything that happened during all those years
You have a book now, of what? is it?
This is not a psychiatric book, it sums up thoughts, which I have been dealing with for a while. It is about human nature and society and is called "structural weaknesses of human reason and its social consequences: why we extend the rules to absurdity, like the populists, we lie to us same and much more ".
Can you derive the content from anything?
I want to show how human beings are vulnerable to errors in judgment and how they tend to polarize. It's a big misunderstanding to believe that the reason is there to know the reality. The evolution did not invent it for that. It does not matter in evolution if the reality is right or wrong. The principle is: Better, but fast and / or unique. If you, as a primitive man, shoot and flee with a lion every time you scream in the bushes, you have an evolutionary advantage over the motivated colleague. He says: "The rustle is too vague, I need to understand its causes better." He will escape too late
What does this have to do with society?
Well, the flaws of the evolution of our society The reason is handled concretely. Think about advertising, populists or totalitarian ideologies. But also science or discussion and media culture in democratic societies are subject to the distortion mechanisms of our reason. It is a big danger in a globalized and digitized world.
Stefan Hohler
(Tages-Anzeiger)
Created: 30.07.2018, 21:00
Source link
