Long imprisonment for St. Galler gunners



[ad_1]

The St. Gallen District Court sentenced a 61-year-old Kosovar to 15 years in prison. He shot dead his 42-year-old cousin in the old town of St. Gallen on the street in May 2016.

  The Kosovar, 61, accused of having his cousin in May 2016 Being shot in the old town of St. Gallen is sentenced to 15 years imprisonment. (Archive nda) (Photo: nda archives)

Kosovare, 61, accused of shooting his cousin in the old town of St. Gallen in May 2016, is sentenced to 15 years imprisonment. (Archive: nda)

(nda)

The District Court of St. Gallen found the 61-year-old man guilty of murder as well as multiple firearms law offenses in his dispute released Monday afternoon. A 15-year prison sentence

On May 12, 2016, Kosovare, a long-time resident of Switzerland, ambushed his cousin in the early hours of his home in the center of St. Gallen. . He took a loaded pistol at the meeting. In a few seconds, he squeezed twice. A blow hit the parent in the head, the victim died on the spot. The gunman escaped and was arrested only a month later after lengthy investigations.

Undisputed Crime

The trial last Tuesday was aimed at qualifying the act. The prosecution demanded a conviction for murder and a prison sentence of 18 years. The defense pleaded guilty to willful murder or manslaughter and upheld a maximum sentence of 12 years for appropriate cause.

The case was largely undisputed. The whole process was recorded by the video camera of a restaurant. The images showed a real execution, said the prosecutor

The accused stated in court that the cousin had a sexual relationship with his wife, who died in 2015. His life and that of his family have been destroyed.

Unreasonable Jealousy

There is no evidence of this, the prosecution responded. Nobody in the environment of the aggressor could imagine that this relationship existed. The 61-year-old man acted out of selfishness and unfounded jealousy.

The defendant argued that the defendant had been morbidly suspicious. Among other things, he had bought technical equipment to monitor the woman in his absence. In the act, it must be granted "a state of emotional urgency."

The judgment is not yet final.

[ad_2]
Source link