[ad_1]
The vote on the SVP self-determination initiative will take place in November, but the voting campaign has already begun. Already a year ago, the economic organization Economiesuisse presented a legal opinion, according to which the SVP initiative was leading to legal insecurity.
Yesterday doubled the association after: In a world where the United States was waging war, it was bad for Switzerland to question their international obligations. "The context in which the initiative is voted has changed," said Jan Atteslander, head of the foreign economy at Economiesuisse, during a conversation with the media. "Many people realize at once how important the rules are."
Countryside without apple
According to Economiesuisse, a yes to self-determination (SBI) would call into question the Switzerland's reliability, the initiative requires that the law of the state be established by international treaties. If there is a contradiction between national law and international law – for example, because an adopted initiative violates international treaties – international agreements must be renegotiated or terminated.
In addition, the initiative introduces a hierarchy in international treaties: only agreements that have been the subject of a referendum would be decisive. At the press conference, Atteslander also underlined the reliance of Switzerland on a global operational commercial policy: at present, Bern has initiated a dispute settlement procedure at the end of the year. WTO. launched to combat the new US import tariffs. "Especially as a small country, Switzerland has an interest in the rules applying to everyone and not just imposing the powerful."
What role plays the unpredictability of the United States in the ballot of SBI, Atteslander remains open. "But I think entrepreneurs and politicians will be shocked when economic agreements are no longer respected." The representative of Economiesuisse Atteslander did not make any further comments on the campaign, but it was too early to vote. Just this: apple trees will no longer be seen this time – an allusion to the campaign of vote lost against the massive mass immigration initiative in 2014.
Since this debacle, Economiesuisse has been focusing more on partnerships with other actors such as Swissuniversities or Operation Libero. In a kind of continuous campaign, various organizations have since engaged in good relations with Europe under the label "strong and networked".
Conflicting Initiative
The SBI would not only undermine Switzerland's reputation as a reliable contractual partner, but it would not be clear either. That's what Christine Kaufmann, professor of public law at the University of Zurich and author of the legal opinion on the effects of the SBI, said. Thus, there is a contradiction between the primacy of provincial law and the declaration that international treaties are valid, provided that they have been submitted to referendum.
For example, Kaufmann introduced the Fair Food Initiative, on which the people will decide one day. is in conflict with the standards of the WTO. Would the text of the bill be adopted if the initiative were adopted? Or will the WTO agreements, themselves submitted to the referendum, continue?
We do not know what Thomas Aeschi, chairman of the parliamentary group SVP and Nationalrat says. "In such cases, what was the norm until only a few years ago, it is that the most recent standard applies to the old." In other words, the provisions of the initiative would be superior to the agreement of the WTO. "We want the Swiss citizen to have the last word on the laws that apply to us."
Thomas Aeschi also does not believe that the behavior of the United States will have an impact on SBI's chances at the polls. "We vote for ourselves, which is true in our country, that it is a desire of left or right." The problem of the contradiction between the federal Constitution and the international treaties is not included in the trade agreements. the Federal Constitution has been concluded.
(Tages-Anzeiger)
created: 18.07.2018, 21:55
Source link
