[ad_1]
Some Call of Duty: Warzone fans still want Combat Scout to be changed because they are “forced” to use Cold Blooded as a counter, which takes away variety from loadouts.
Over the past year or so, Warzone has undergone some pretty drastic changes, many of which aim to shake up the weapon and loadout meta in battle royale.
One of the biggest changes was the introduction of two Warzone-specific perks – Combat Scout and Tempered – the former becoming a huge annoyance for players as it revealed their position when fired, if only briefly.
Upon release, the Perk was called “horrible” and “overpowered” by gamers and content creators, and their hands were essentially forced to run Cold Blooded like a hard counter. However, it continued to upset Warzone fans.
The Combat Scout perk is still handled by many players – with a pick rate of almost 30% according to WZRanked stats – and complaints are still quite common, even from those who use the perk in their games. loads.
Redditor zfluffz brought up the subject of the power of perk again, claiming that it is always “OP” regardless of which counters players may use. “Being forced to choose an advantage (to counter) is unbalanced. Like how suppressors are OP because you’re forced to use them on every version, or how dead silence is OP because only one advantage against it, ”they said.
Some players were quick to agree, with one noting that the advantage gives players an offensive boost – which they probably didn’t need – and others arguing that executing the advantage with FMJ can be ridiculous. powerful.
I don’t care what the robots say, the combat scout is OP af. This clip annoyed me and I’m the one who made it from CODWarzone
Of course, not everyone agrees with that sentiment and will just run Cold Blooded anyway, but then again, it plays into things getting stale because you only use one. advantage.
Not everyone will accept the meta and can even choose three of the lesser-chosen perks, but it’s clear that some groups of players want at least some changes to be made.
[ad_2]
Source link