[ad_1]
YOUR DAY | "The welfare of the police and the abuse of power by stray cops are two separate issues."
IGP gathers details of cops concerns about the IPCMC
BN vote out: According to Inspector General of Police Mohamad Fuzi Harun, the police want a representative to the Independent Commission on Complaints against the Police (CMCP). But having one of theirs at the commission goes against the original purpose.
If they do, they might as well delete the "I" from the IPCMC.
On the other hand: Police want to impose conditions on the makeup of the IPCMC? This is all the more reason why there should not be a representative of the police on board an organ of control and discipline.
Anonymous # 13114320: Before the establishment of the commission, it is also important to examine the well-being of the police, that is, their base salary. I doubt that their salary currently corresponds to their responsibilities or is sufficient for their social needs.
The government needs to look at countries like Singapore, Hong Kong and South Korea and understand how to improve their welfare before eliminating corruption.
Otherwise, it will not be effective and will only create a lot of disgruntled officers. Ask yourself if you have the decency to take care of your family, would you risk resorting to crimes?
Malaysia Baru, land of sunshine and hope: What does their salary have to do with the misdeeds of the police? Do you mean that the police can continue to do what they want and that the public has no way of repairing these wrongdoings? This actually makes the public the victim of easy trigger cops.
The police should live within their means. If I understand correctly, with the allowances and the overtime, the officers bring in a nice sum at the end of the day.
Should the IPCMC not be implemented so that some corrupt officers can afford to live in luxury with kickbacks from gambling and prostitution syndicates, code violations road, illegal immigrants, etc.
Some officers live beyond their means. The IPCMC will discipline our police force. The police may not want the commission, but the surveillance does not belong to him.
Dirtbag: All countries have their own internal investigation offices; ours should not be different. We need to check for abuse and corruption in such systems.
Kutan: The first thing the Pakatan Harapan government should have attacked is the reform of the judiciary and the police. Put it in motion at least, so we'll see you doing something.
For police chiefs, social assistance eclipses the pressure in favor of the IPCMC
Kawak: The government must pay attention to the grievances and grievances of the police force. This is especially true for those in the lower ranks. The shabby apartments they live in and the low wages for high-risk jobs.
Look at how Singapore remunerates its police officers and looks after their well-being. The police should have their own salary scales, different from those of the general public service.
As long as they will have financial difficulties to cope with the rising cost of living, they will need "extra income" from other sources.
snowcrash: The fact that the head of Bukit Aman's Standards and Integrity Compliance department can say he wants a flexible oversight body is why we undoubtedly need a strong CIMCM.
The IPCMC must be formed and funded immediately before the rot of our police force worsens.
Gérard Lourdesamy: The welfare of the police is an administrative matter of the Ministry of the Interior, which is an integral part of the terms and conditions of use of force. The IPCMC is a policy issue that involves constitution, good governance, integrity and human rights.
I agree that a statement of the rights of the police may be included in the law on the IPCMC, but the police must not equate one with the other.
Do they say that the commission is not necessary because the police are allowed to abuse their power or to engage in unfair, illegal or corrupt practices to make up for their so-called mediocre wages?
All power must be limited and subject to appropriate and effective supervision and regulation.
The police can not behave as if it were a law. They must be responsible for their actions, even their inaction.
Anonyme # 69337042: The IPCMC should be implemented without further delay. He has been waiting for more than 10 years.
Good and responsible police officers should not be afraid of commission. Only those who abuse and abuse their power to self-develop and enrich themselves need to worry about the IPCMC.
There have been many complaints about police misconduct and there is no way for the public to put forward their grievances.
The public hopes that with the IPCMC, the police will purify its tarnished image as a corrupt and inefficient repressive agency.
Abasir: The veteran journalist A Kadir Jasin should intervene. He should, as an old teacher, tell those district police chiefs who moan that there is no logical connection between public complaints of corruption and reprehensible behavior and their only concern for the good -being the police.
Veteran Waythamoorthy Schools Journal, Maszlee
Mamadias: Excellent article Kadir, you know the inner workings of the Prime Minister, Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, and the way he runs the country.
You have enough time to advise the Minister of Education, Maszlee Malik, and the Minister of National Unity, de facto, Waythamoorthy, on what needs to be done or not to manage the issues. problems of this country.
More of this kind of constructive criticism will be good for everyone in the management of the country. It looks hard, but it's a good start.
Plato: Kadir, I think you hit Waythamoorthy below the belt. he interrogates why Subang Jaya police chief distorted the facts by stating that two Indian groups were fighting in the incident of Seafield Sri Maha Mariamman's temple, instead of being opposed to a Malaysian group that has penetrated on the temple grounds and to the faithful, confirmed by the Minister of the Interior, Muhyiddin Yassin, to Parliament.
Is it a mistake or do you think such questions should be swept under the rug, as during BN's time? If Waythamoorthy had not questioned and corrected the statement of the district police chief, he would have only further angered the Indian community for such misrepresentation.
Please, get out of your Umno mindset because it is "New Malaysia". We need ministers to speak in favor of rakyat, instead of hating their words in front of officials who continue to bicker in the line of duty.
Behsaikong: As the Prime Minister's official advisor on media and communications, this man should not be free enough to reprimand or bar ministers as he did before.
He must decide whether he really speaks for himself or for his boss. In fact, with his official relations with the Prime Minister, he should be quiet.
We, the people, do not have to guess whether he speaks for our Prime Minister, or just for himself every time he writes on his blog. If he does not have the discipline, he must then be replaced as spokesman for the prime minister.
We do not forget that it is the man who announced that more than 40 deputies from Umno were going to go to Bersatu. These are very serious questions to publicize.
Even if his views are correct in some specific cases, there must always be a protocol. Is he saying what he thinks or is he the spokesman for the Prime Minister?
Ian2003: In this 'New Malaysia' everyone is free to say what it is as long as they are wise words, and what Kadir said is really wise. So, rest assured, ministers.
The above is a selection of comments posted by Malaysiakini the subscribers. Only paying subscribers can post comments. Over the past year, Malaysiakinians have published more than 100,000 comments. Become Malaysiakini community and help define the news program. Subscribe now.
These comments are compiled to reflect the views of Malaysiakini subscribers on matters of public interest. Malaysiakini does not intend to represent these views as facts.
[ad_2]
Source link
