– The most remarkable thing about BT for a long time

DEBATE: "The only thing I ask is that you reproduce me correctly – not just what I say – but what I mean in reality," writes Trym H. Aafløy in People's Action No.

Base a editorial Bergens Tidende criticized the mayor's comments, whose party is gravely affected by FNB's progress, solely on interviews in other media. Revolutionary journalism, I thought BT had not done it. The veracity of BT would be to contact us for a direct statement.

Tax money comes naturally from other people. After hard work. The inhabitants do not always seem to be used with respect. Just mention the parliamentary garage.

When BT writes "But the people who make elections should prevent – not encourage – contempt politicians," thus missed the author. The ETF does not encourage anything: the permanent mission has existed among voters for a long time, but the toll business is a case that has brought contempt to the surface. So there is nothing that FNB brings to the market. We also do not create mood. Some would say that BT itself helps create the mood – if it appears clearly here – in much the same way as many business and leaders, as well as some published reader letters with open comment fields on the web.

Then, BT puts up the horrible conditions around the mayor of Klepp. Indirectly recognizing the Bergen ETF criminally for criminal acts by mentioning it in an executive where you criticize FNB, is a low target until then unknown to BT. This is called "guilty by association". You are stuck to an action simply by being mentioned in the same text. Pure stigma!

at BA case: It's too unified. What is an elite politician and how do people define the term the most? What the mayor or a committee of local democracy believes is irrelevant. The ordinary citizen has a different opinion of the term. Thus, it is not the FNB that wants to distinguish between politicians and elected officials, perception that already exists in the population, regardless of our party.

BT writes: "He also can not promise that voters will get more information before the September elections." Not to promise is not the same as denying. It is extremely difficult for a newly formed party to put in place a detailed political base. Dialogue with voters and information is precisely what we want, but to demand it already is too much demand. The main lines are in the program. Details and budgets take a little longer. But voters are happy for the moment, even if BT is not. By the way, I've answered BT on a number of questions about it, which you publish next week. I do not know BT's writing what political department does?

Finally, As a person, I can tolerate a "push to the face". I tolerate both criticism and a dose of personal harassment, which is what many opponents do to me. I also have no problem with the fact that the media make requests, and I usually ask when you ask for it. The only thing I ask is that you reproduce me correctly – not just what I say – but what I really mean. And that you do not add myself or the party I'm proud to be part of – opinions or attitudes that we do not have. This is not always the strength of BT.

I will continue to answer when BT asks for it, no problem. I am a proud supporter of democracy and freedom of expression – and all members of the FNB will mobilize for those who ask us.

Good choice!