[ad_1]
Svindal himself has Red Bull as sponsor and drove until last season with the sponsor on the helmet in front of Telenor, which Kristoffersen and the rest of the team had to drive. If Svindal was allowed to run with Red Bull, it is because he had entered into the deal before Telenor had exclusive rights.
Before this season, the most important profile of the national team was also to undermine the pressure.
Kristoffersen believes that the Norwegian Ski Federation (NSF) is unreasonable when it refuses that people drive with another sponsor on the helmet and that it cost him a lot of money. The 24-year-old decided to divorce in court. A week ago, the EFTA court made a statement that gave partial support to both parties.
Want uniform rules
The Kristoffersen case was a natural theme when Svindal and the rest of the motorboats were charged until the seasonal opening in Lake Louise this weekend. Svindal became involved when NTB asked him questions about it.
"The EFTA Court has supported Henrik, but what I am going to say is only my opinion: I understand Henrik, he observes Marcel Hirscher, a member of the Austrian federation, whose rule of law is different from that of the Norway: Is it fair, should not all federations follow the rules of the FIS and have fairly similar rules?
"For the moment, it's 100% of the leaders of each federation.In my opinion, all people under FIS should be subject to the same rules.That's why I understand 100% Henrik, and it's unfortunate that he can not fix the problem with the FIS, but he has to fight his own federation, the FIS should know that it's interfering with the federal rules. "Other federations also have problems "says Romerike Alpine King.
Common rules can end the problem, says Svindal.
"If all federations operate with the same rules, we can only say that no one in the world can do it.It is more difficult to fight, but now everyone has different rules and different solutions, so I understand Kristoffersen It is difficult to accept your federal decision.
Taken conflicts internally
Svindal also sees the federal side of the case.
"It is difficult for national federations to find the sponsor money they need to build teams and help the next generation – we need to understand that – I'm not saying that the Norwegian system is wrong, but what Not going, it's that Henrik sees Marcel on the podium and thinks that they live in two different worlds.I think it's wrong.
However, when it comes to conflict management through the media, the two national comrades have different points of view.
– The reason there is so much writing about it is because it is in open conflict with those who are connected. I also had my matches with the connection, but I kept it internally. Henrik opens the doors and uses the media to put pressure on the connection.
Respect the different points of view
Svindal does not intend to play the match, even next to Kristoffersen.
– What can I say? I have had so much fun with my problems in the last years of my career that I will not fight again. Red Bull, I know that there is no problem, but there is no point in not running with their logo on the helmet.
Skiforbundet states in a comment to NTB that the Norwegian model states that "sponsors contribute to the functioning of national teams and the community".
– In Austria, they chose a different model. At the same time, Norwegian athletes also have the opportunity to make personal appointments, for example, Kristoffersen and Svindal have included Red Bull. We respect the fact that there are different points of view on the weaknesses and strengths associated with this model, "said Espen Graff, head of communication.
The trial between Kristoffersen and NSF will be held in Oslo next March.
Source link
