[ad_1]
Last year, Carl I. Hagen's Nobel Committee dream was shattered by an emergency intervention in Parliament. On Tuesday, the Storting adopted new rules and Hagen believes that Torbjørn Jagland is decorated with frescoes by the Labor Party.
Parliament welcomes a new electoral scheme for Nobel committee members on Tuesday.
A full presidency of Parliament proposes that leaders of international organizations whose states are members not be elected to the Nobel Committee.
However, this will not have retroactive effect and the change of rules will not affect Thorbjørn Jagland, Secretary General of the Council of Europe as a member of the Committee.
This gives Carl I. Hagen the opportunity to react strongly.
– He should withdraw as a result of the decision made by the Storting today. When he will no longer be eligible, he should resign! As the head of the Council of Europe, he has the task of seeking a good pardon for all the governments of the Member States and this could affect his work and his opinions in the Nobel Committee, says Hagen to ABC Nyheter.
After the Nobel Prize last year, Venstres Abid Raja called the Labor Party to find out if it was wise to continue.
He believes that Jagland should now be wise.
– No law has retroactive effect. But Jagland can choose to exercise wisdom by following the Storting's clear decision, writes Raja in a text message to ABC News.
Until now, ABC News has not managed to reach Torbjørn Jagland.
– Never speak
The Storting attempted to clarify the rules as to who can sit on the Nobel Committee last year, following the raid around the FRP's appointment of the former party leader and parliamentary convenience. Carl I. Hagen.
In December, Hagen followed the hearing debate, but on Tuesday he participated in the debate as a staple product.
– In 1997, it was agreed that electoral representatives should not be members, as all parties have followed with loyalty. There was no mention of deputy representatives, "said Parliament Speaker Hagen.
– The practice was followed. At the same time, it was established that the distribution of seats follows the election of party groups at the election of a member of the committee. Over the last 31 years, I was a member of the Storting, it was never said that other party groups would interfere in a Nobel Committee nomination. It would be quite unusual for another party to disagree with a party entitled to a member, said Hagen.
In December 2017, the Storting condemned the fall Nobel drama by condemning the outgoing president's dream of joining the Nobel Committee. The majority announced an emergency decision three days earlier, violating the principle that parliamentarians and deputies – like Hagen – could not be elected.
Drive to Støre
The MP accused the Labor Party of fearing his.
"The first time that it was mentioned that representatives of deputies should be mentioned, when my name was launched as a member of the committee," said Hagen.
– Then the Storting decides that the deputies should be exempted from being eligible. This had a retroactive effect in the current process. Then the Labor Party or other opposition parties were a little concerned that the decisions are not retroactive, but today, when a new decision is made, it is explicitly stated that no retroactive power should be granted to Jagland to allow him to resign from the Nobel Committee. The Labor Party and Jonas Gahr Støre must defend a remarkable principle. Retroactive power may be awarded to a political competitor, but no retroactive effect shall be accorded to a separate party member.
"I think that the fundamental difference of treatment is sad, even if it is never so populist in the eyes of the Labor Party and Jonas Gahr Større," said Carl I. Hagen.
Kolberg: – The garden has never been chosen for anything
With the new regulations, Thorbjørn Jagland is probably the last member of the Nobel Committee who also heads an international organization such as the Council of Europe.
Martin Kolberg. Photo: scanpix by Terje Pedersen / NTB
"In this case, there is nothing to derogate from the fundamental legal principle that no law, regulation or decision should be retroactive," said Martin Kolberg (AP) of the Labor Party.
He did not agree with The Hague allegations that the Labor Party would be different. Kolberg rejected the fact that the decision on deputies last year had a retroactive effect.
– Representative Carl I. Hagen stated that there was no order for us to understand the use of the retroactive sentence. It's incorrect as it does. Carl I. Hagen was chosen for nothing at this time. This is a process that led to the adoption, preventing representatives from joining the committee. It was a decision that was made before Carl I. Hagen was chosen. Retroactivity is not a topical issue, like the Hagen tent, said Kolberg.
The garden was always on the side.
"When I talk about retroactivity, it's the moment when the process starts, then you have a regulatory framework.When the party is asked to promote candidates, the process is going on.That's when that my name appeared that new decisions had been taken and that the process was underway.I strongly believe that the Labor Party is a party led by the populist on the side of Jonas Gahr Støre.We can only wonder what is the reason: if there was a Jagland phone that did not want me at the committee, we do not know it was mentioned as an opportunity, said politician Frp.
The Chair also recommends that members be re-elected only once, that is, they may sit for up to 12 years on the committee. The recommendation was delivered Thursday and will be processed in the Storting on 27 November. After all, the decision of the chair will be adopted.
SEE THE VIDEO: Here Mukwege celebrates the peace prize of the year
[ad_2]
Source link
