[ad_1]
The Attorney General for Special Economic and International Crimes (SØIK) believes that Danske Bank has violated the anti-money laundering law on four Danish issues in connection with Danske Bank's Estonian branch from February 2007 to January 2016.
"This is a very large and voluminous investigative material, but we are now at the point where we have a culprit against the bank, but it is important to say that we are still at the beginning of our investigation. investigation, said the prosecutor and head of the SØIK, Morten Niels Jakobsen, according to Ekstra Bladet.
In a report on the web pages of SØIK, it is stated that the investigation follows two main traces: the one seeks to find out if it is possible to initiate criminal proceedings against the bank for violation of the law on money laundering. The second is whether you can take personal responsibility for Danske Bank's management.
In the present case, Danske Bank was the subject of a claim only.
In a statement, Jesper Nielsen, Acting Head of Danske Bank, said the sentence was in line with expectations.
"We were expecting an initial SØIK verdict on the outcome of the investigation we presented in September this year," he said.
Will cooperate
In addition, Nielsen states that it is in the interest of the bank that the investigation be conducted in its entirety and that Danske Bank cooperates with Økokrim.
"In recent years, we have taken a number of measures and the situation is now very different from that which prevailed when the suspicious acts were committed in Estonia.We continue to give high priority to this area, says Nielsen in the report.
Four points
Økokrim stresses in its statement that Danske Bank has repeatedly failed to control Estonian activities. The view is summarized in four points:
- Firstly, SØIK believes that the employees of the Estonian branch did not receive any instruction or training to comply with the Danish Anti-Money Laundering Act and that the branch sometimes did not have Compliance Officer.
- Secondly, Danske Bank in Denmark has not done enough to put in place risk control mechanisms that can prevent suspicious transactions from going under the radar.
- Thirdly, the bank was not enough to know who was behind suspicious transactions – clients could also be at particular risk of money laundering or terrorist financing.
- Fourthly, Økokrim considers that the Danske Bank headquarters in Denmark should have, at an earlier stage, seized the critical points mentioned above.
Danske Bank writes in the stock market announcement that he will not comment anymore.(Conditions)Copyright Dagens Næringsliv AS and / or our suppliers. We would like you to share our business using a link directly to our pages. The copy or any other form of use of all or part of the content may only be done by written authorization or as permitted by law. For other terms please see here.
Source link
