[ad_1]
Torbjørn Røe Isaksen is certainly so worried that he draws one of Høyres' favorite stars: everything was better during Jens Stoltenberg.
There he has a point. Things were much better during the red-green government, even when it was a matter of managing the EEA agreement.
We represented the EEA. We have ensured that Norwegian regulations are in line with the European acquis. Businesses, workers, students and travelers enjoy equal rights and equal legal protection.
We defended Norwegian interests. We have ensured that Norway retains the right to return to hydropower. Organized a new system of differentiated social security contributions. Assigned a set of EU decisions relating to energy, environment, welfare and district policy. S actively tackle the challenges of social dumping through two comprehensive and concrete action plans. Further development of cooperation in the fields of justice, foreign affairs and security.
A support beam for Norway
Under the Solberg government, the Labor Party maintained its long-term support and extended to the EEA agreement. This is a support element of Norwegian foreign and security policy. We can disagree on a part of this country. But we traditionally come together through the blocks to ensure the continuation of the essential agreements for the nation. We do not run games with such.
For Røe Isaksen, it is not very close to the last one. He is in the ministry and is keen to give his assent on how the Labor Party should handle the turmoil associated with parts of the EEA agreement in the labor movement. Week after week, he is convinced that the Labor Party is not what it was and feared for the future of the EEA agreement.
The Minister of Industry should set aside light wines to do their job. It can be assured that the Labor Party is doing ours.
The Labor Party led the negotiation process of the EEA agreement in the first half of the 90s and obtained a large majority for the agreement in the Storting. The majority has remained in every election since 1993. I have been involved in the EEA negotiations for a number of years, I am familiar with the agreement and I am firmly in favor of it. At the same time, I defend Norway's right to defend our interests, even when we should not be in agreement with the EU. This opens the market for. The blind unit, which seems to be Røe Isaksen's model, does not belong to us.
The EEA agreement guarantees us equal treatment and free access to markets that receive nearly 80% of our exports. The big European survey, initiated by the red-green government, showed in 2012 what significant benefits Norway has cooperation within the framework of the EEA, in almost all areas of society.
Essential for Norwegian companies
The agreement covers much more than the free trade agreement concluded in 1973. It imposes an entirely different obligation of equal treatment and allows us to achieve together other important objectives, such as research and education. , the fight against organized crime or joint efforts to achieve our goals. the climatic objectives.
The agreement is important when it comes to commercial policy and even more so when it is preparing for the storm. As now, with penalties, in both directions, between the main actors American, Chinese and European. The protection of the EEA agreement is therefore vital for Norwegian companies.
Just because the EEA is so crucial for Norway, it is important to take seriously the demanding pages of the agreement. This responsibility lies with the Labor Party. I often discuss these challenges with those who are most affected. Norwegian workers are concerned that they can maintain Norway's wages and working conditions in Norway, as well as those who work in areas where hiring is regulated and, in some cases, half and 100% crimes.
The Commonwealth, the largest industrial union in the world of work, is concerned that the EU's low-paid workforce must outpace that of Norwegian workers. The latest decision in the Tariffnemda case, in line with the decision of the EFTA Surveillance Authority, rejected the fact that Norwegian employers must pay the travel, boarding and accommodation expenses of workers traveling from Germany. In Norway. Unions fear that this will favor outside workers.
It's a challenge for our professional life. Norwegian courts initially decided that travel, accommodation and accommodation costs should be borne by the employer. The court found that this was part of the Norwegian model of working life. This understanding was then challenged by NHO and by the employer.
Do something, do not just talk
Røe Isaksen even goes so far as to say to DN: "you have to be careful in cases that, at worst, can threaten the whole EEA deal". Exactly. You have to be careful about this. And the Minister of Industry of Høje should have maintained such a close dialogue with the parties that he dialoged as clearly as possible and not in advance.
Røe Isaksen has more wisdom to convey: "It is important for the government to react with new measures and a new force against workplace crime and unacceptable conditions in working life," he said. Yes, it's important – it's so important that he does something about it, not just talk about it.
Norwegian policy, including the EEA Agreement, has great potential. Just look at the 30 countries of the EEA, they are very different in terms of organization and basic social and economic conditions, despite the common rules. The action room is in the right direction under a H / Frp / V government, as it was in the red-green direction when we ruled from 2005 to 2013.
Therefore, it is much more important for the daily life of the Norwegian jobs that govern Norway than what is adopted in Brussels.
Røe Isaksen and his colleagues are expected to spend their time finding employment in Norwegian working life, a much more active business policy that can increase investment, the trade deficit of mainland Norway has reversed and exports have increased.
But it is hardly possible to give the country a new government by 2021.
Source link
