[ad_1]
The case is being updated.
Once again, the freedom of expression under pressure at NTNU. Earlier this fall, he stormed Øyvind Eikrem, an associate professor in the Department of Social Work, after being interviewed by Resett's controversial Web site related to the double killings in Trondheim. At the time, the head of department, Riina Kiik, had informed Eikrem that he had damaged the reputation of the department with his statements.
READ ALSO: Some people at the NTNU need a lesson in freedom of expression
Now, the institute has went into the salad again. The reason is a student call that criticizes Eikrem and his statements to Resett. According to Nettavisa Khrono, Eikrem has received a letter from a lawyer from the NTNU HR and HSE department, in which it is stated in particular that the content of the students' letter should not be transmitted as it may "result in exposure to self or other people, "mental mistreatment", which would violate the law on the working environment or the law on higher and university education. In practice, it seems that NTNU is trying to impose oak strips.
Earlier this fall Marit Reitan, dean of the faculty where Eikrem works, wrote in a column in Khrono that the university leadership plays "a role in building a good culture of culture, based on ethical standards recognized in research ". Now, Reitan tells Khrono that the new Oakbelt case should be handled internally "because students may experience a regrettable mental tension by making sure that the case is exposed in the media". We would like to know what ethical research ethics makes acceptable the use of the legal sword to make Eikrem untouchable.
READ LEARNING: Study spaces must show more flexibility
This is a group Student writer, a critical call against Oakbelt is obviously within the limits of freedom of expression. The fact that the institute and faculty protect students as this can result in a "regrettable mental tension" if the case attracts public attention is totally below targets. The university does not have the task of packing students in the water. We fully agree with Dagbladet, who wrote Tuesday to management that universities should teach people to take a stand, do not become a school in strategy to silence people.
The university is going defend the right of researchers to express themselves, even when they feel that department heads do not like it. The department and the faculty who want to limit freedom of expression with independent references to mental tension are not only on the paths they have completely traced. It's an embarrassing sight.
Follow Addressavisen Opinions on Facebook and Adresseavisen on Facebook, Instagram and twitter
[ad_2]
Source link
