[ad_1]
HAMAR (Dagbladet): The defendants Ida Andenæs and Christian Flemmen Johansen explained how they felt that the prosecution could not prove that Svein Jemtland, 47, had perpetrated the murder of Janne Jemtland, 36, with forsæt.
tinder account
According to Svein Jemtland, the war that sparked filming began at night until December 29, due to the creation of Tinder.
"She would react strongly if he was in Tinder or he had suspected that he had been unfaithful," begins Andenæs.
The defender also reports that several people said Janne Jemtland had "bones in his nose" and could be aggressive.
"No one has ever reported violence or described Svein as being aggressive towards Janne, quite the opposite.Nothing indicates that there was more than just normal marital arguments," she says.
Show more
– Can not exclude Jemtland's explanation
Andenæs goes on to explain to Jemtland that the shot should have disappeared by accident when the couple fell. The weapons experts at Kripos felt that it would be difficult to shoot with the weapon in the position exposed by Jemtland.
– There can not be enough to dismiss his explanation. In our opinion, there is no evidence of coverage to rule out Jemtland's explanation. That's what he's accused of and denies the punishment. What happens next, he recognizes and assumes responsibility, she continues.
It passes to the hour that followed the fall of the coup, where the hidden trail of Jemtland and even said that he arrived at a point of no return.
"It's crucial in every way possible, but it does, there's nothing rational about what he's doing … it's in the situation." Svein Jemtland drops a kilo by day, he is described as apathetic and is strongly influenced by the situation.It is the complete chaos prevailing.
– The theory of printing becomes a faultless guess
Andenæs asks when and where Janne Jemtland may have been drowned. The prosecution says Janne has drowned in two to three hours.
Andenæs notes that there is no trace of blood inside the house, indicating that she is not drowned there. The prosecutor admitted that they did not know where she should have been drowning.
"It's a good guess to say that Janne was stored in an intermediate stage before being drowned in Glomma.This is not in the evidence.Not least, when should this be ? she asks.
Jemtland explained that he had moved off the road around 5:30 am after being showered and having swept the snow in the yard.
"At that moment, Janne would have died from the shot, if Svein Jemtland, in those three hours, takes Janne to a water station, I do not understand when it should have happened." There is very little time to Carry on.
Disagree when Janne was dropped in Glomma
One of the other unanswered questions in this case concerns the time when Janne Jemtland was thrown to Glomma.
Prosecutors say Janne was sent to Glomma on 2 January.
Based on the acquisition of traffic data on mobile phones and on hours of driving recorded on three relevant cars, the prosecutor claims that Svein Jemtland could not travel the distance of more than 61 kilometers from the residence to a partner and come back to Brumunddal while he claimed it.
Defenders, in turn, disagree in this calculation.
Show more
Andenæs also reports that a total of 119 km was traveled on 29 and 30 December. They think that this could fall to Jemtland's explanation that he would have shipped her overnight until December 30th.
– The day of the car may have been settled in the summer. Then, there is only about an hour before everything is destroyed. The car should have been sent to the factory because the margin of error is very small in our case.
– It will be noticed that there are so many possible sources of error that we can not rule out the return of Eid Bru on December 30th.
She also stated that it was more difficult to finish the trip on January 2 because Jemtland had a guest for the night.
"We must also remember that at this point Svein reported that Janne Jemtland had been missed, and she was wanted on January 2. The reason is that Svein calls the police after she arrives in Glomma. is in the area, this presents a huge risk of discovering it.
– Much worse than what he explains, it can not be
In addition, the defender shows that Svein Jemtland does not give a "fictional" explanation.
– Why in the world would Jemtland give such an explanation if it does not matter? she asks.
It now shows the theory that Janne Jemtland was lowered into the water shortly after firing, which Jemtland refuses.
"He had almost better understood this explanation than the one he thought should have been taken naked, wrapped in plastic around Brumunddal," she says.
– Why in the world should he explain wrongly? Big worse than what he explains, it can not be. This is not striking. It does not make sense. I think this is the most important proof that Jemtland says, vote.
Andenæs also says that she does not rule out that other people may have been involved in the murder.
Calls for revenge for killing
The accused concludes;
– It is stated here that the evidence has not been gathered and that Svein Jemtland must be released after the indictment, says Andenæs.
It states that acts committed after shooting are punishable and that, for example, they may be subject to the 1951 Penal Code on the Equality of Offenses.
"Jemtland is fully aware of this and assumes responsibility for this violation, which is not what he is accused of, he is accused of killing.
Thinking 15 years is appropriate
Defender Flemmen Johansen now points to several points of the proceedings of the actor.
He considers, however, that the claimant's request is too strict.
– The actor went too high. If the court finds that there are particularly aggravating circumstances and that it is found guilty, we estimate that the sentence should be 15 years, "said Flemmen Johansen.
In addition, the respondent claims that the prosecutor's claim for compensation, which was 450,000 and 350,000 respectively, is too high.
– Our argument is that Svein Rishovd Jemtland is fired for the murder of Janne Jemtland. Svein Rishovd Jemtland is also considered as the least possible, "concluded Flemmen Johansen.
Requires 18 years of imprisonment
Attorney General Iris Storås has today resigned from his 18-year application for imprisonment for the former alien, who is accused by the Hedmark District Court of having killed Janne Jemtland ( 36).
Storås pointed out that there were several criminal circumstances in this case.
– In my opinion, there is no doubt that the circumstances are extremely aggravating. The shot itself is not enough, but it shows the strength of the defenses. The act appears as pure execution and he finds the weapon. The shot is in the middle of the front, and there is no other reason this one shoots to kill, Storas said in court.
She also feared that Janne Jemtland did not feel the lies against the children and that he also blamed the woman.
Advokat barns Inger Johanne Reiestad Hansen all downloadsSvein Jemtland is denied the right to inherit and the right to life insurance money.
The verdict is expected in two to three weeks.
Source link
