[ad_1]
l & # 39; investigation against the former parliamentary representative, the minister and the county governor have been around for a long time. The case is a police and political missile hidden behind a thin layer of anonymity. With the accusation, there is a broken hole in the village, and what seems to be shaking. In the plain and direct language used in the appeal decisions, the sexual relationship described Ludvigsen should have had three young male asylum seekers. One is easier mental retardation, everyone had passed the sexual age.
Prosecutors asserts that Ludvigsen obtained this sexual intercourse by abusing his position of county governor, dependency relationship or trust. This is where the Ludvigsen case stands out from many other issues related to sexual abuse. Ludvigsen's political career is that of a man who had the greatest confidence in society. As an elected people in Storting, as minister at the king's table and as a senior official. He was also known for his kindness and help.
Prime Minister Erna Solberg says she "knows Svein as a good colleague and good guy". The candidate Høyres ordfører in Tromsø and leader of the Bar, Jens Johan Hjort, is even more direct in a statement to ITrøso. Deer says, "Svein has been and still is a bauta in the right.He is really interested in all kinds of people.It is a kind that cares about everyone." Hjort also said that which should be said in such cases: "We all have the obligation to consider Svein as innocent until proven otherwise".
Even says Svein Ludvigsen that he is innocent and that he has not had sex with the three men mentioned in the indictment. He is also relieved that the case has now a course for the courtroom and that it be settled there.
Who will meet him there are respondents that night. Legal is based on the accusation of a battery of articles of the Penal Code relating to the abuse of position to acquire sexual intercourse, to the abuse of a person in a situation of vulnerability or having led a person to sexual benefits and to the section on trafficking in human beings. The detention of the most serious conditions is six years imprisonment.
In the first case The prosecution considers that Ludvigsen exploited the victim's poor stance "as a resource and particularly vulnerable young single asylum seeker". The second relationship concerns the exploitation of someone's developmental intellectual disability. As county governor in Troms, Ludvigsen sought out the person in an institution under his control "and would have handed him Norwegian citizenship in a ceremonial manner and let NN believe that he had the power and authority to do so. authority to give him and deprive him of his citizenship.
Another point of appeal Describes how Ludvigsen led the offense to "believe that he had the power and authority to give him and deprive him of residency and / or citizenship permits, so that NN feared the consequences of the cessation or denunciation of sexual relations with third parties ". This last case concerns several sexual acts in which Ludvigsen led a single asylum seeker seeking resources without a permanent residence permit for sexual relations. As a former county governor and politician, Ludvigsen urged the asylum seeker to believe that he could obtain housing and a permanent residence in Norway.
l & # 39; abuse took place in several locations between 2011 and 2017, including in the Ludvigsens cabin, at home, at Fylkeshuset in Tromsø, in several hotels in Oslo and in a car park.
There are a number of criminal offenses that have a higher sentence setting than Svein Ludvigsen is charged. But for a politician, it can not be worse. There is a big difference in the number of cases. The three men are between 40 and 50 years younger than the retired right superior.
More importantly, Ludvigsen's transfer position and the description by which the appellant described how he took advantage of this role. We find ourselves in a field that is not only serious in the sense of criminal law but also in ethical terms as far as human freedom and dignity are concerned.
The court decides guilt and punishment. If Svein Ludvigsen is judged, he is no longer a bauta, neither right nor anywhere else.
Source link
