[ad_1]
You can hear it or not when Dagsnytt 18 airs on March 19 this year, when it exploded in an immigration debate with so-called web editors Hans Rustad (Document.no) and Helge Lurås (Resett).
Eivind Trædal, MDG politician and social debate, has written a book where he is not so angry, but where he has the same message especially: "We must find a settlement with the hatred you defend."
Uses bullying
In his new book "Why external law wins the debate and how we can stop them", Trædal also uses the main battle against Hege Storhaug and Rita Karlsen of the Human Rights Service, Hans Jørgen Lysglimt Johansen in Microparty Alliance and Many roles online, with even more extreme views than before.Many roles call themselves full names, and that's fine.After all, they put their opinions on social media.
One of the few
Booking in Trædal is important and it does not come too soon. There are too few people who have opposed hatred, lies, conspiracy theories, Islamophobia and rhetoric that most organizations and people in the extreme right in Norway.
The author extensively reviews Resett, Document.no and Rights.no and shows how conspiracy theories and false news are an important part of their message. He also thinks that those who wanted to leave these right-wing activists in the good business in the newspapers, on the radio and on television made a mistake. This did not bring the lid to cover the pressure cooker; On the other hand, it was legitimate to have opinions that promote hatred and ultra-nationalism and that share humanity in "us and them," according to the author. The boundaries for what was accepted as man have been displaced – without much protesting.
Should create a debate
It's a book that should spark debate, and Trædal adds a number of premises. He believes that those who claim to be duped in the name of freedom of speech claim the same crush on themselves as their opponents. When Hege Storhaug & Co sees the victims in a cultural battle, they do not take into account the fact that many immigrants and refugees they are fighting against are victims.
Through the subtitle of the book, one has the impression that Trædal has given a lot of thought to the solutions in the fight against the far right. There are, but this aspect of the case is a little exaggerated – especially thanks to the promotion of the publisher. But when it is necessary to tell the truth, it is not easy to propose strategies that will have or that can be successful.
Trædal does not just criticize the external law. He thinks the traditional right has been for the loss. He also blames the "port guards" for being fundamentalists of freedom towards extreme Muslims, while they are facing the same extreme garden on the far right. As for the left side, he thinks he's had an opposite approach, which was not lucky either.
Criticism of the media
The media also gets theirs, both because they bring extreme views and because they sometimes look for extreme words that only a few people can take advantage of. As he writes:
"A declining media industry and a blogosphere of pseudo-topical pages on the way met on stairs."
This is not an objective book, it is not meant to be. But Trædal is sometimes a bit hard – as when it almost gives the impression that being rich, it is economically supporting groups on the far right. For this commentator, it is also inappropriate to put as many people in the same cabin as the murderer and terrorist Anders Behring Breivik, even though Trædal thinks that the community is only ideological and not in action.
Many metaphors
Trædal likes to use metaphors, which are mostly lucky. With regard to the "normalization" of Høyres radiation, he writes:
"The Norwegian electoral party has summoned some chess, but right-wing extremists have been thrilled to be able to deal with the case."
The book is full of role examples in social networks, which is not surprising for many of us. Maybe the author could have been a little more selective when it came with examples.
It is not easy to write captivatingly on such a serious subject, and you sometimes have the impression of being somewhat aware of it. In some parts, I also think that Trædal has a somewhat too academic approach.
As it is a book that should be published to all the Norwegian people.
A bit about the end: Eivind Trædal, a politician at the MDI, acknowledges throughout the book that he belongs to the left side of Norwegian politics. This should never give so little hope for the reddish and a possible government majority if it ever arrives at the Storting.
.
Source link
