[ad_1]
Nearly a million and a half new threats for Android have been identified only in the first quarter of 2018. There is no doubt that it is best to protect all devices running under the system of Google exploitation. It's the third year that we have compared an antivirus for Android. More than 200 security apps are created by different developers on the Google Play Store.
Using the German ranking as a base, we asked in a survey on our site which were the main antivirus for Android that our readers wanted to see in our battery of tests. Of the top 20 best evaluated solutions, the top five voted and chosen for this month's Digital Lab were: Avast Antivirus 2018 for Android; AVG Free Antivirus for Android 2018; the DFNDR ((reads "defend")) Security, from PSafe; Kaspersky Mobile Antivirus 2018; and Google Play Protect 9.1 itself, which is already integrated into the operating system.
Our opinions were from the point of view of a regular user. But, as we have said, we support our complex and specific reporting tests by other independent organizations such as AV Comparatives, Eicar, EV Tests and SE Labs to validate our comparisons. The badyzes were done on a Moto G6 Plus running Android 8.0 Oreo. And to test protection online, we visit the malicious sites listed by the PhishTank organization.
Download and Use
All applications except Google Play Protect, which is a native function of the operating system, were very concerned about the experience of the system. ;user. None of them has presented any slowness or detail that might bother them when downloading, installing or scanning the device first. Of course, you will still have to answer the question if you do not want to upgrade your application to the paid and full version of the solution. However, when you open applications for the first time, there are few taps until a full scan of vulnerabilities and threats is done. The four, in this first comparison that has a lot to do with practice, are related.
Performance
Another important print! In this regard, we evaluate the impact of the antivirus running on the smartphone. In the perception of a regular user, it is impossible to notice a change in the performance of the device with any of them running in the background. What exactly is planned? after all, no one wants to install an antivirus that slows down the phone or runs out of battery quickly. At this stage, independent laboratory tests are very important; and the result is that all the applications and solutions tested here today have achieved maximum performance; that is, do not leave the smarphone slow, do not consume the data of your Internet packet, nor change the energy autonomy of the device.
Interface
Now, what decides is the ease of use of application. As we said at the beginning, everyone seems to be very concerned about the user experience. If you have not noticed, Avast and AVG are virtually identical; not by chance, after all in 2016 Avast decided to buy the rival, but always keep both solutions available for download. Both applications boil down to a single screen plus a larger scan button and four other main functions just below. What bothers and breaks the norm, still in the free version, is the huge amount of ads that sometimes occupy almost the entire screen.
On the home screen of the Kaspersky solution, one monitors the level of protection of the device and, below, the additional options. The disadvantage is that, in addition to the majority of the features being available only in the paid version, for many things you need to create an account to gain access. What pleases most in the test version of Kaspersky, is the lack of commercials.
The PSafe DFNDR seems a little more interesting than a simple central button. Again, because this is the free version, after each run, almost the entire screen is taken by a huge publicity. On a second screen, the available cleaning, protection, performance and privacy tools are grouped in a very intuitive and easy-to-use way. The cool part is that some functions, as in other applications too, are offered in the form of new applications.
Efficacy
It's time to talk to Google Play Protect. Of course, all tests are important, but the ability to really protect your device is what matters most. To make this badessment, we only use one solution at a time installed on the smartphone, we perform the first digitization, we try to download specific applications for tests simulating different malware that must be immediately blocked and also download files simulating viruses. Finally, we tried to access a page that the PhishTank institution has described as malicious by phishing.
Google Play Protect only worked on identifying malicious sites but could not block any applications that simulate viruses. In short, with him alone, you're not protected – even though recent episodes have shown that even Google Play Store is immune to intrusions. Last place, far from the competitors … in the AV-Test rankings, the native Android solution took the ZERO rating in protection!
Already the other apps, all have detected and blocked threats; both when they were already on the devices and also when we tried to install the test tools again. Kaspersky's solution was the one that did the most profound badysis. And when we visit these sites with malicious code and consider them a phishing practice, even Google Play Protect has worked – at least that's all!
Extras
The only feature present in all of them including Google Play Protect, is the anti-theft or loss feature of the device, which allows users to block or unmask. remotely erase device information in addition to locating the device via GPS. With the exception of the integrated Android solution, all others also feature a call blocker and a secure phishing navigation feature. Avast, AVG and PSafe solutions also have an application blocker that locks them with a pbadword for added security.
Avast, AVG and PSafe have a security test and an Internet connection speed. And PSafe stands out by offering a virtual private network. In Kaspersky, some additional features like the antiphishing filter for text messaging and the application blocker are only available in the paid version of the application.
Price
Not all services tested are free of charge. As we said earlier, there is a price to access some additional features. The annual license of Avast and AVG costs only 6 reais a year! At Kaspersky, the annual license costs 30 reals; already PSafe is the most expensive: it bills, in the annual plan, 7 reais a month, totaling 84 reais in the year
Conclusion
It does not take much No effort or even understanding to know that the Google Play Protect can not even compete with other security solutions. Everything protects more than natively the service natively on Android.
At a much higher level, but still little behind his rivals, was Kaspersky's solution; A key factor was that many important features such as anti-phishing, for example, are only available in the paid version of the application. In the vice leadership, the PSafe solution is great. With a security level close to 100% and interesting features. The disadvantage is the value to get the premium version of the tool;
And at the end of this Digital Lab, a link that is justified: Avast and AVG offer virtually the same solution, with only different names. Both achieved a maximum score in efficiency and also in the performance question; In other words, they have no impact on the battery life, they do not slow down your smartphone and do not consume data or Internet traffic. The solutions protect smartphones against viruses and malware responsible for pop-ups and advertisements. They also alert users when they install malicious applications and block attacks from e-mails, links, websites and messages. Applications also include application blockers and calls, file cleaners, Wi-Fi scanners, and photo safes. Otherwise, if you want to be free of commercials, the value of 6 reais per year is very affordable for anybody.
So, what did you think of this double victory? Have you tried or used any of the applications compared here today? What is your opinion? Leave your opinion in the comments. Until next time
[ad_2]
Source link
