[ad_1]
The 2018 World Cup already has the mark of lime as a recurring place. Due to the use of the video refereeing system (VAR), the tournament played in Russia feeds a record: being the World Cup with the highest number of kicks scored. 24 penalties were scored in the group stage. Of these, 19 finished in goals, another new achievement. According to FIFA's record on Friday, on seven occasions, referees have used the tool to report infractions in the area.
With the 32-team dispute pattern, the 1998 and 2002 World Cups were the ones that added the greatest number of penalties: 18. Of these, 17 were goals. To illustrate the excessive increase this year: in 2014, in the Cup that was played in Brazil, only 13 penalties were scored and 12 finished in goals. In South Africa, in 2010, 15 were tagged and nine converted.
There is no doubt that the VAR has played a major role up here in the competition. The tool has been used 17 times during games to remove doubts about arbitration. A curious fact occurred in the match between Iran and Portugal, duel valid for the third round of the world. Referee Enrique Cáceres used the video feature on two occasions to report a penalty for each side. It was the first time the tool was used to score two penalties in the same match. Cristiano Ronaldo lost, Ansarifard is converted.
Before the FIFA World Cup, FIFA released a document with the VAR report which also put forward arguments against its use. The loss of playing time was among the main complaints of managers and supporters, but the agency revealed that the VAR uses only 1% of the total time of the match. You lose more time with the sides and corners than with the function. In the World Cup, the improvement is obvious.
Another point taken into account was the average time to check the offers. At the beginning of the use of the electronic resource, it is what caused the most problems, but the improvement has decreased the time. The wait is on average 20 seconds, while the possible corrections go from 39 seconds (via internal communication) to 70 seconds (field control). Another example of improvement of the World Cup.
Among the interesting data is the average of a clear error corrected by the VAR all three parts, while the unrepaired clear errors are in one in 20 parts. The call helped the referee to correct the wrong decisions in 24% of matches, while it was decisive for the end result in 8% of them.
With the help of the video, the 2018 World Cup has a penalty shoot-out (Photo: AFP)
Despite a record in 2018, VAR & # 39; Neymar penalty shot
Despite the significant increase in the penalty, recent complaints from coaches and players with certain decisions of the video referee system are common in the World Cup. FIFA, however, has made a positive badessment of the use of the tool.
– FIFA is extremely pleased with the level of arbitration and the success of the implementation of the VAR, which has been positively accepted and appreciated in the football community – said the organization.
Brazil has been at the center of the problem twice: the first in which Miranda was pushed into the zone by Swiss striker Zuber in the game that led to the tie goal in the early days of the game. Brazilian national team. Then it was Neymar's turn to be punished for technology. In the match against Costa Rica, shirt 10 was touched by defender Gonzalez. Judge Bjorn Kuipers of the Netherlands scored the penalty. However, after being alerted, he viewed the video and changed his decision.
– Both can give or can not give (penalty in Neymar). Me, Adenor, not the technical Titus. With a pinch of more than Gabriel, what I said was the interpretation. If I am the referee, lime. If it's me, I will not be back. But respect because it is susceptible of interpretation. We do not need arbitration to win the match, we want it to be fair. As it was watched now, he had been watched before. And interpret as you like, but look, be the same for everyone. For me, Adenor, it's a penalty. This guy Gabriel I would not have. Brazil does not want help, the athletes and the coach do not want to. He wants to win by being more competent – said Tite after a 2-0 win over Costa Rica.
On Friday, the refereeing director of FIFA and Uefa, Pierluigi Collina, considered the match against Switzerland a correct example in the use of VAR.
– In football, all the contacts are not lacking. Note that no one complains.
Lance with Neymar sparked controversy in this World Cup
Check the penalties scored so far in the Russian Cup:
France 2 x 1 Australia – Goal: Mile Jedinak ( Australia)
France 2 x 1 France – Goal: Cristiano Ronaldo (Portugal)
France 2 x 1 Australia – goal: Griezmann
Argentina 1 x 1 Iceland – Messi has lost the penalty (Argentina)
Peru 0 x 1 Denmark – Cueva lost the penalty (Peru)
Croatia 2 x 0 Nigeria – Goal: Modric (Croatia)
Sweden 1 x 0 South Korea – Goal: Granqvist (Sweden)
Tunisia 1 x 2 England – goal: Sbadi (Tunisia)
Colombia 1 x 2 Japan – goal: Kagawa Egypt 1-0 Egypt – goal: Salah (Egypt)
Denmark 1 x 1 Australia – Goal: Jedinak (Australia)
Nigeria 2 x 0 Iceland – goal: Sigurdsson lost the penalty (Belgium)
South Korea 1 x 2 Mexico – goal: Carlos Vela (Mexico)
Anglet wand 6 x 1 Panama – Goal: Harry Kane
Belgium 5 x 2 Tunisia – Goal: Hazard (England)
England 6 x 1 Panama – goal: Harry Kane (England)
Saudi Arabia 2 x 1 Egypt – Fahad Al Muwallad missed the penalty
Saudi Arabia 2 x 1 Egypt – Goal: Salman Al Faraj (Iran)
Iran 1 x 1 Portugal – Cristiano Ronaldo missed the penalty
Iran 1 x 1 Portugal – Goal: Karim Ansarifard (Iran)
Iceland 1 x 1 Croatia – goal: G. Sigurdsson (Iceland)
Mexico 0 x 3 Sweden – goal: Granqvist (Sweden)
Switzerland 2 x 2 Costa Rica: Goal : Sommer (cons)
[ad_2]
Source link
