[ad_1]
247 – In an internal communication, João Roberto Marinho, managing editor of Globo, imposed censorship on the journalists of the house, in the name of "the exemption". In practice, it is the "law Chico Pinheiro", uploaded on Globo after a speech of the presenter in a Whatsapp group, explaining the indignation of the presenter to the political prison of the former president Lula . Now, Globo's journalists are being watched over in their private lives, so they do not have a different opinion than the boss's.
"Dear Companions and Companions,
Nobody will dispute that the advent of social networking is one of the defining phenomena of the 21st century, in an unprecedented way in the world. the history of humanity, they connected people on a global level, allowing the formation of communities, the sharing of ideas, facts and opinions, the approach of people who are often not even known.It is extremely positive and welcome.
Like everything else, we soon discover that they also have a dark side: they can be used to manipulate groups, spread rumors and lies for undemocratic purposes, and allow people's privacy to be clandestinely known.Aware of these flaws, however, its users are becoming more and more in balance between the good and evil, we believe that the good side of social networks l & # 39; "Take it to the wrong side, even though we have a lot of studies and attention still needed to fight the evil. We are finally excited about the positive potential of social networks.
We journalists, like all citizens, can be part of it from a personal or professional point of view. We can share impressions, feelings, facts from our daily lives, as well as use them to make sources, to gather news, to discover trends. However, journalism brings bonuses and burdens.
The bonus is the pleasure of engaging in a fascinating activity whose ultimate goal is to inform the public, so that you can better choose how you want to live, how to freely make choices, activity that we consider, without shame, as absolutely noble. The burden is precisely the one we impose to be able to do good journalism: in short, do our best to undress anything that might cast doubt on our exemption.
I know this is not necessary, but here I give one or two examples For example, all journalists who cover the economy (and those who are in charge of writing) For example, they deprive themselves of the freedom to apply in specific newspapers so as to never arouse suspicion of certain information about a particular company or a personal interest. A cultural journalist linked to an artist will be considered as prevented from covering his activities. We are familiar with our restrictions, as described in our editorial principles published by Grupo Globo on August 6, 2011. And none of this bother us or disturb us because we are aware that the goal is to allow us to make good journalism and to be recognized by him.
Social networks also impose some restrictions. Unlike other people, we know that we can not do that by ignoring the fact that we are journalists and we must act in such a way that our exemption is not in question. In launching the editorial principles, we predicted by establishing the following: "The participation of Globo Group journalists in internet platforms such as personal blogs, social networks and collaborative sites must take into account three badumptions : Journalists are largely responsible for the image of the vehicles they work for and must take into account in their public activities, avoiding anything that could compromise the perception that they exercise their profession with exemption and correction. "
Since then, however, the use of social networks has become universal in such a way that we need to better detail how we journalists should use them in a way that does not detract from what is a pillar of our profession: the exemption. That's why we add a section to our Editorial Principles on the Use of Social Networks
These recommendations on how we should behave on networks are idiosyncratic or exclusive. Indeed, they are strictly in line with the practice of the world's most prestigious journalism vehicles, such as the New York Times and the BBC, to name just two of the dozens of examples.
It is imperative that we read carefully these guidelines.
That being said, Section II of our Editorial Principles will include a new article, number 5, at the end of this letter.
I am absolutely convinced that all of us will understand the reasons for these more detailed guidelines and will follow them. I thank you for your attention and I make available the text that will be added, as of today, to our Editorial Principles.
Rio de Janeiro, 1 July 2018
João Roberto Marinho
Grupo Globo
Save on your purchases using discount coupons
[ad_2]
Source link
