[ad_1]
247 – Minister Gilmar Mendes of the Federal Supreme Court issued a decision prohibiting the conduct of an interview. The Minister stated that the relationship between freedom of expression and constitutionally protected personality rights was conflictual. Gilmar wrote: "In this context, in the continuous process of baderting, affirming and realizing press freedom, the judiciary has and continues to play a decisive role in the interpretation and the application of potentially conflicting constitutional principles. "
points out that " See argued that the ban on interviewing violated the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court, especially the ADPF judgment 130. In this case, the court had ruled that there should be no impediment to freedom of expression and interference. "
Another excerpt from Gilmar Mendes' text states his confession:" the judge of TRF-3, in ruling on the case in question, did not rely on any provision of the Press and Freedom of Expression Act. judgment that there was no restriction on the freedom of the press, nor any sort of prior censorship or prohibition of the flow of information. "
Save on your purchases using coupons
[ad_2]
Source link