[ad_1]
Allegations that a security officer poisoned and beat an abandoned dog provoked a wave of protests against a Carrefour store in Osasco, São Paulo. Animal advocates have used social networks to call for a boycott of the network. The fact would have occurred last Friday, 30, on the parking lot of the hypermarket. According to the report, the officer allegedly offered rat poison to the dog in the middle of a piece of mortadella.
According to activist Rafael Leal of the NGO Dog Leal, a protest rally is held on Saturday 8 in front of the supermarket on Avenida dos Autonomistas. "We invite all good people to denounce this crime, and we also ask that people do not buy in a network store."
According to Leal, it was established that the dog was free there. and was nurtured by customers and employees. "While the store was going to be inspected, a senior officer asked an officer to remove the dog," he said.
He also stated that the employee had used the food to lure the dog into the parking lot. "When he arrived, he gave the mortadella with the famous granule, the poison of the mouse, which also beat the animal," he said.
"Carrefour has already admitted that the animal had been injured by the employee, although it was an accident." As a police report has been registered, we think the police will order it. camera images and hear the witnesses, "he said.
The Osasco civilian police reported that she had already heard the management of the establishment and that, in addition to the witnesses, she was going to look for images of cameras that could record this. which had happened. According to the police, the animal having been cremated without taking samples, there might be no indication on the cause of death, which would make it difficult to prove possible poisoning. .
However, the testimony of a witness can prove the badaults. The employee, who would be the outsourced security of the establishment, has not yet been located. According to the civilian police, he had requested permission to travel and was only to return on weekends.
In a note, Carrefour stated that it recognized the seriousness of what had happened in its store. "Carrefour recognizes that a serious problem has occurred in his store in Osasco." The company does not exclude its responsibility. "We are saddened by the death of this animal and we sincerely hope that all the facts will be clarified." The network also informs that, whatever the conclusion of the investigation, "we are fully committed to repairing these damage".
Osasco Prefecture reported that the Department of Wildlife and Animal Welfare was on site and found the dog. injured and with severe bleeding, in addition to multiple excoriations. "The management was entrusted to a qualified animal control officer and the animal was referred to the department for emergency care," he said in a statement. Knowing that it was a case of mistreatment, the investigation was opened at the request of a police investigation at the police station specialized in police and police. ; Osasco.
Law Professor and Lawyer Rafael Paiva, Chair of the Constitutional Law Commission of OAB / Santana, said that in theory, "only the investigation can indicate the cause of death and who is responsible ". , the case is a crime of animal abuse, provided for by the Environmental Crimes Act. According to him, the person directly responsible for the crime would be the security that would have perpetrated the beatings against the animal. Apparently, this conduct was ordered by a superior. In this case, if the order is given, that person will be the co-perpetrator of the crime, if all is proven. "The sentence is from three months to one year of detention with an increase of one-third the number of deaths of the animal
the lawyer, Carrefour can also react through the action from its representatives it is proven that the order originated from a person having some control of the store. "Because it is a crime against the environment, the legal person can also be held responsible. The law brings specific peculiarities in the case of a legal person. One of the sanctions is to no longer receive tax benefits and to prevent participation in public tenders and contracts with public authorities. "It is also possible that the company is the subject of a public civil action to repair popular clamor
[ad_2]
Source link
