"Bolsonaro has no plans for the country", says Luciano Huck – Jornal CORREIO

Presenter and businessman Luciano Huck claims that he does not see in the proposals of President-elect Jair Bolsonaro "a country project". Although he claims that Bolsonaro "misled no one" during the election and defends a vote of confidence in the future president, Huck presents a plan to reduce inequality for the country "to not be lost forever. "

The presenter has already admitted that he can no longer get out of the "box" of politics, where he came in when he came to be listed as a potential underdog in the race for president this year.

In this interview with the newspaper O Estado de São Paulo, Huck admits that the center converges to a new party and comments on the charges against Senator Aecio Neves (PSDB) and the former President and man of 39; business Luciano Huck said that he did not see in the proposals of President-elect Jair Bolsonaro "a country project". Although he claims that Bolsonaro "misled no one" during the election and defends a vote of confidence in the future president, Huck presents a plan to reduce inequality for the country "to not be lost forever. "

The presenter has already admitted that he can no longer get out of the "box" of politics, where he came in when he came to be listed as a potential underdog in the race for president this year. After much speculation, he refused to enter the polls. In this interview with the state, Huck admits that the center is converging on a new party and comments on the charges against Senator Aecio Neves (PSDB) and former President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.

In a recent interview with the state, you said you could not go back. to the little box that was & # 39 ;. What will be your next step in politics? Are you going to join a party?

My intentions have not changed. My actions over the past 18 months have never been a political, personal, personalistic project in the sense of what I was doing in my favor. From the beginning, it was a generation call. And I think that she continues to be like that. It's been 19 years since I traveled the country very intensely – from all corners and all edges. This person does not take me away. You can do masters at Harvard, but you will not learn it. And what bothers me, for some time and quite frankly, is the inequality we have in the country. So, if we do not have a clear and well-designed project to reduce inequality, this country will be evaded forever. . I'm thinking of the super-legal initiatives of the third sector and philanthropy. On the other hand, only those who will have the power to reduce inequalities in the country are the state.

I think it was very clear during this election that people were thirsty for new things. I think that Bolsonaro is the crystallization, the materialization of this non-conformity, this disbelief of politics as a whole. The merit of it. He is elected president. But I have not seen the campaign as a whole, of all the candidates and I still do not see a country project, I can not see it. We are talking about cabling and plumbing here, but not the structural reforms that are necessary, that all agree and that are necessary for the country not to break. But they calculate arguments. I do not see what is the project of the country and, for the agendas that depend on the personal conviction of Bolsonaro, he does not lie either. Chancery, for example, I may not agree. Education, that when he came to fan the name of Mozart (Neves Ramos), I said "bading insect!" I'm going to celebrate Bolsonaro … But no, he went on a path that he thinks.

Do not you see any plans for a country in the future government of Bolsonaro?

We live in a democracy. He won the elections. The election is won. He will do his government with the things that he believes. I really think that at the moment, it is not to make opposition. I think we need to give a vote of confidence to the one who won. The beauty of democracy is that the vote is individual, but the responsibility for the result is collective. He won the election legitimately. This is not the time to oppose it. It's time to talk, it's time to talk. I do not think Bolsonaro cheated on anyone. He did exactly what he said he was going to do. The economic team is a highly competent liberal team, endowed with a good head, engaged and very good names, starting with Paulo (Guedes), which I have a lot of respect and taste.

But you see in Bolsonaro a Country Project?

I do not think so. And I do not say that as a negative thing. I do not think he had time. He won the election seized in the neck, with 7 seconds of television, no money .. Won in the race and marra him. I do not think he has a country plan, but the guidelines with which he won the elections will allow him to act. Sérgio Moro, whom I like and whom I have a lot of respect, I think that he has several functions in this government. First, for those who have questioned democracy, from the point of view of what Bolsonaro said in the past … Sergio Moro is a legalist. As the Minister of Justice, a legalist has the power, it is clear that the laws will be respected. And on the other hand, a liberal program in the economy that he can achieve becomes reality. She needs an effective agenda, but she must be emotional. If you do not have a very focused social agenda, with clear priorities, the country will remain uneven. Reducing inequality is a huge and complex problem.

How to relax disarmament, school without party and the environment, is there a risk of regression?

I see a risk of withdrawal. . In education, I see. The evolution in Brazil over the past 20 years has reached such a level that all those who study education today are trapped, everything is in a consensus, speeches are a bit similar. Everyone knows our problems. Our problem today is to raise the level of quality. Nowadays, it is a question of qualifying and evaluating teachers, of fighting against school escape, of making literacy at the right time, of making school the epicenter of the city and the city. society. Everyone is on this path. Now, the head that Bolsonaro has put there … For me, discussing school without a party is now such a stupid thing.

How did you manage the fla-flu of politics?

who have a semitone. But the halftone does not have to be a political party, as we have to form a central party … I'm really not on this page. It is much easier for me to stay on TV to do my show and make my money than to be here to talk about these things with you. It's exactly outside my comfort zone. What happens to me is that I do not want to play politics because I do not want to be a politician. I want to be an active citizen who will actually contribute to a new cycle for the country: to bring people, to heal people, to bring ideas, to lead the world, to find solutions. I want to lead Brazil and be able to create a powerful magnet to attract people and do something else. Leadership, of course, will appear. In this context, which is not simple, I do not wonder if it's right or left. I want to see good ideas. In the end, it is about improving people's lives, reducing inequalities, improving favelas, distributing income, including Maria Inajá, a functional illiterate woman. 6 children, besides the Bolsa Família, how can their children have a future … The debate on how we can have a less unequal country … and does not mean that the rich have to impoverish themselves, No, I just want the bottom to have a decent level of decency. I'm going to hit with both legs, I think he's got good heads on both sides. I do not worry too much about taking sides. My side is the side that feels good in the country, which is good for everyone. I am able to criticize what I do not share on the Bolsonaro agenda and support what I think is positive for the country.

Former President Fernando Henrique Cardoso recently said that it was necessary to create a "radical center" Politicians like Paulo Hartung have led conversations … This is your political domain?

I have talked a lot about Paulo and I think what he did in Espírito Santo is an important landmark of public management for Brazil. this characteristic of not raising flags and wanting to join good people .. President Fernando Henrique is, as always, someone very lucid.I think the reorganization of the party is going to be necessary, because of the blocking clause, because of a number of things going on.I think the center is going to organize it all alone …

In a New Party?

I think so, you are converging on that, the two greatest badets of the small s parties to survive were the television time and the party fund. They lost.

Traditional parties failed?

I think so. There is a party cycle that is over. You see through the renovation. The party of the president, which until yesterday was a small party, now has 52 deputies. You have the PT, rightly, which has lost its relevance. The PSDB has not been able to give power to its new leaders and to actively and directly engage in the discussions of recent years …

He has relations with Aécio Neves?

I have not spoken to the Aetius since the charges against him surfaced. I'm not proud of that, I do not celebrate it either, but I thought it was the best thing to do for the moment. Over the past decades, he has played an undeniably important role in Brazilian politics, in Congress, in Minas Gerais and in Brazil, to the point of having obtained more than 50 million votes in the 2014 elections. Personally, we have also been close. For this reason and not to know and not even imagine, I was very surprised and disappointed by the facts that were revealed. Now, it's up to him to prove his innocence and heal his wounds over time.

I am very sad about what you see in the prison of former President Lula and the whole process in which he participates with the PT.

to see a figure like Lula, who had the global relevance of Lula, who had an active social agenda and materialized in several projects that improved the lives of people, arrested. But it's also obvious that he's not stuck by chance. He is imprisoned by very relevant and convincing evidence that the PT has not only equipped the state, but also created a network of corruption to support a political project in which many people have become rich. I do not know if it was the case with the former president, but a lot of people. It became clear that the PT installed a gang that attacked the public coffers, which attacked the treasure. The ends do not justify the means. Although the PT has an important social agenda, it does not mean that you can steal the state.

What is the evaluation of the results of the revival movements? ]