[ad_1]
Fragile talks on climate change in Poland have shown the limits of international action to limit global warming in a polarized world, imposing on governments, cities and communities the burden of putting an end to climate change. Increase in temperature.
Negotiations conducted in Katowice, Poland, prevented the Paris 2015 agreement from disintegrating on Saturday (15), by agreeing on a set of guidelines relating to its Implementation.
Carbon credits, which could prompt businesses to take action to combat climate change, and no firm commitment has been made to strengthen the emission reduction targets of the countries of the past 2020, when the agreement will come into force.
away from the goal of Paris to contain global warming to less than 2 degrees Celsius and even more of the 1.5 degree ceiling, considered necessary and the loss of plant and animal species.
The world travels to a maximum of 3 to 5 degrees Celsius in temperatures during this century, said the World Meteorological Organization of the United Nations. .
The Paris Agreement is based on individual commitments and expectations that negotiations in Poland could produce more than the rules on how to measure them have always been weak. The unit built in Paris was shaken by a wave of governments that placed national agendas at the head of collective action.
Few leaders from their countries were present in Katowice and the UN Secretary General had to return to the meeting to request that
"There is a lack of political will," said Alden Meyer, director of the Union of Concerned Scientists, a group of non-profit scientists, after the conference was delayed more than 24 hours because of disputes of last resort.
"He (the pact) offers governments, cities, businessmen, civil society, etc., the means to do the job [às metas do Acordo de Paris]," he added. Conference, Michal Kurtyka, said the job was well done. "Mission accomplished," he wrote on Twitter. "Our children will look at our heritage and recognize that we have made the right decisions at key moments like the one we are going through today."
Surface Agreement
For countries already in the throes of climate change, the agreement did not specify what would be the necessary funding for actions to combat global warming, which is not the case. was little better than nothing.
Grenada's Minister of the Environment, Grenada, Simon Stiell, told Reuters the agreement "
Investors said the government should take further steps to convince them to make the investments
"These countries … to move forward with ambitious and long-term climate policies will reap the investments and economic benefits that flow from them," said Stephanie Pfeifer, Executive Director of Invested Group. The United States, determined to withdraw from the United Nations process at the request of President Donald Trump, organized an event highlighting the benefits of climate change: More efficient combustion of fossil fuels, including coal, while Trump defined the Paris agreement as "ridiculous".
A scientific report requested by the signatories of Paris affirmed that the share of the The energy generated by coal is expected to be reduced by 2050, as well as significant cuts in other fossil fuels, to prevent temperatures from rising above 1.5 degrees Celsius. and cause devastating floods, storms, hot flashes and droughts.
The United States, as well as oil producers Saudi Arabia, Russia, and Kuwait refused to qualify the "welcome" report, a term suggested by countries wishing to put more money into the country. focus on their priorities.
But the discussion on the report was far from the only one: China, India, the United States, the United States of America, Russia, Australia, Japan, the Brazil and the European Union have had a number of differences, although China has been praised for helping to overcome the concern, particularly from the United States, that Beijing would avoid any rule.
"I think they've gone through one," said Jennifer Morgan, executive director of Greenpeace International, about Chinese negotiators.
Although he described Washington as "out of sync" in the negotiations, Morgan pointed out that the rules established in Poland countries, including the United States, up to the planned withdrawal by the US government. North America's agreement in 2020, which constitutes a realization of "
Poland, host of the Third United Nations Climate Conference, has been criticized for its commitment to coal, which is the more polluting fossil fuels. "
"But that does not replace the need to increase ambition," she said.
The final declaration of the meeting only underscored a demand from Warsaw for a "just transition", allowing coal-dependent communities to have more time to adjust.
Source link
