[ad_1]
In customs matters, the themes are much more volatile than the unsurpbaded constant economic precept that prohibits us to spend more than we produce from a long time. Today, no federal government would bother to ban badfights, like Jânio. Even larger themes, such as cowboys and rodeos, go to Congress and the STF.
How about the ban on bikinis? This would cause a greater movement than the revolt of vaccines at the time of Osvaldo Cruz.
The interesting thing about Jânio was not the coexistence of these two directives, which, on another level, also exist in the Bolsonaro government. The interesting thing was the way Jânio combined them.
Whenever he was forced to take unpopular economic measures, Jânio lifted one of those bans that electrified public opinion. It was much more comfortable to focus attention on the bikini than on the fragile national finances. More than similarities, I see in the Bolsonaro government the end of something that appeared in the Jânio government: the so-called independent foreign policy, which established diplomatic relations with socialist countries, included Cuba. Still without judging the merits of these policies, everything indicates that the ideological weight in the direction of Ernesto Araújo will revolutionize the foundations of Afonso Arinos' work. Consequently, comparisons between the Janio and Bolsonaro governments can not ignore this discontinuity. (…)
The first task, and in this I believe that the memories of Arinos will help us, will be to examine the experience of Jânio. I did not completely reach it in the book. But already at the beginning, there is reference to Jânio's instability.
Collor was also a conservative experience. But this seemed to be aimed at the economy, cosmopolitan consumption, a clbadic defense of the environment. (…)
[ad_2]
Source link
