[ad_1]
It is worthwhile to devote half an hour to the inaugural speech of Ambbadador Ernesto Araujo's inaugural address at Itamaraty. It is instructive to reveal the mental construction of one of the possible "intellectuals" of the Bolchonaise.
The initial greetings are symptomatic, notably "his imperial highness Dom Bertrand de Orleans and Bragança"
and presents a belristic tone of the times in which the streets of Ouvidor and Gonçalves Dias were the center of the elegant world of Brazil in the late nineteenth century. There are many phrases in Greek and Latin, from Clarice Lispector, Renato Russo, Raul Seixas, Barão do Rio Branco, Fernando Pessoa, Marcel Proust, Azeredo da Silveira and Cervantes. Ah, and by Olavo de Carvalho, "a man who, after President Jair Bolsonaro, is perhaps the main person responsible for the changes that Brazil is undergoing."
As for the captain, the words are also superlative: he "It will free Brazil by the truth." The mission of the diplomat will be similar: "Free Itamaraty (…) perverse ideologies". A sentence and phrasing come out: "From today, Itamaraty returns to his beloved homeland".
EMBORA BAGUNÇADA, the speech has a center of totalization: the Nation, the Fatherland and "love". In some pbadages, the chain of sentences resembles a positivist couplet, even if Auguste Comte is not quoted. The three concepts form the strength-idea of the whole government. Regardless of their degree of ornamentation – after all, we deliver the pre-salt, Embraer, Alcantara, and so on. -, this dominant vector must be taken into account. It has a strong popular appeal. "The fight is for the nation," he repeated a few times.
The fragmented narrative accelerates over minutes, in which he indicates "friends" and "enemies". "We admire Israel, (…) we admire the United States of America, who worship their heroes," he said. And he continues: "We admire the countries of Latin America that got rid of the São Paulo Forum regimes, we admire European countries like Hungary, Poland and New Italy", all ruled – or under way to be – by the far right. "And we are criticizing the tyranny of Venezuela," he said.
HISTORY OF ARAUJO PERCORRE, beyond doubtful boundaries. "We admire the people who have crossed the oceans and founded us", not to mention the blacks and leave out those who were already there. We were founded from the outside, is the wording. At this stage, Araujian scholarship is not mastered and another quote illuminates the room. It is an excerpt from Hail Mary in Tupi, which pays tribute to the work of the Jesuits in their colonial catechesis.
The new member of the body who was inaugurated confesses with emotion. "When I watched the movie" Independência or Dead "(1972), with Tarcisio Meira and Glória Menezes, at the age of five, I did not think it was exist. " And he admits that by embracing his diplomatic career a few years ago, he saw the pictures and references to Dom Pedro I and Dom Joao VI at the ministry headquarters and said "that it exists! "
In this epidermic exaltation of nationalism, the attacks against "globalism" have not failed, which would go against our values and "theophobia, which is the hatred of God" .
"The world has not moved inexorably towards socialism," he says almost at the end, is heading inexorably towards globalism. "To achieve his goals, he badures us:" We will have an Itamaraty open to the people. "The demand from various sectors of society for a ConPeb (Council for Brazilian Foreign Policy), which openly accompanies diplomacy, has not even been touched.
Folklore is not worth the new minister, although his ideas and texts bring a certain exoticism.It is noteworthy that a radical change is under way in Brazil's relations with the world.
Spoken speeches seem to be a determining mark of There is one thing about the twitter culture in these interventions.It is necessary to look for some central aspects:
1. The official formulations are now totaling in the concept of nation, country and country. 39; love The left must be attentive and rethink these themes with a bias of democratization, as a strong popular call, as well as in national symbols. It is not demagoguery. The challenge of symbols and values is at the center of the struggle for hegemony;
2. As in Bolsonaro's speeches of possession, the totalization of the speech involves the constant identification of enemies: "globalism", "gender ideology", "socialism", "politically correct", and so on.
3. There is an articulated approximation between the law of the world.
[ad_2]
Source link
