[ad_1]
Carlos Alexandre Da Costa, Special Secretary for Productivity, Employment and Competitiveness of the Ministry of the Economy, reaffirms has already decided to reduce the contribution of System S, but it remains necessary to set the percentage, which should range from 30% to 50%, said Carlos Alexandre Da Costa, Special Secretary for Productivity, Employment and Competitiveness of the Ministry of Economy. "We are not in a hurry, but we want to be agile," he says. "It's time to open this black box to society."
We already knew that a good part of System S, mainly the first generation – Sesi, Sesc, Senai and Senac – were black boxes. Transparency is minimal and the entity information transmitted to the TCU is inconsistent. Real estate and financial badets are huge, the criteria for hiring and spending are not always Republicans. It is time to open this black box to society.
recently told the O Estado de São Paulo newspaper that the S. system would no longer be the same.
We are already detailing some proposals that will bring more transparency. These will be the first steps. Even System S will not, I believe, refuse to have more transparency. It is because the TCU determines it, or because the society imposes it.
The Minister Paulo Guedes (of Economy) had said that the reductions would be about 30% to 50%.
Will mandatory collections be reduced? Management will be cut for several reasons. The first is that everyone gives their contribution quota. The government will cut the meat. In my special office, for example, I have reduced costs by 30%. It is now System S's turn to do its part. This opulence is not compatible with society.
What mr. appeal of opulence?
I can not say it yet because the data is not transparent. The TCU report reports a huge badet and many properties are misused, others are disabled. Let's wait for the conclusion of the TCU. If all this is confirmed, there is almost a disdain for wealth, which is taxpayers. It's not people A, B or C.
The idea of the Minister Paulo Guedes, with whom I agree and I was a kind of portage. voice, is to reduce and return to businesses. In fact, it is about reducing the cost of the Brazilian labor force.
So, no percentage would be allocated to the government?
No. This would contradict even our goal of being less Brasilia and more Brazil. The companies we spoke with counted down to reduce the cost of labor. It's not about reducing the good services of System S. It's about reducing the cost of System S for businesses. By paying less manpower, companies will be able to train and hire more employees and create more jobs.
When mr. will have a more concrete evaluation of the system reform proposals?
Fix the reduction in the next few months. It will not be a political criterion, but a technical criterion. We are not in a hurry, but we want to be agile. I hope that System S will adopt the principles of transparency, based on the report of the TCU.
So, no percentage would be allocated to the government?
No. This would contradict even our goal of being less Brasilia and more Brazil. The companies we spoke with counted down to reduce the cost of labor. It's not about reducing the good services of System S. It's about reducing the cost of System S for businesses. By paying less manpower, companies will be able to train and hire more employees and create more jobs.
When mr. will have a more concrete evaluation of the system reform proposals?
Fix the reduction in the next few months. It will not be a political criterion, but a technical criterion. We are not in a hurry, but we want to be agile. I hope that System S will adopt the principles of transparency, based on the report of the TCU.
