[ad_1]
At a time when some people are beginning to see Queen Elizabeth II as a way to save Brexit, the British monarch gave a closed-door speech calling for "points of convergence" and never to be lost "
Without ever mentioning Brexit, since the Queen has a duty of political neutrality, Isabel II addressed Thursday an event marking the centenary of the Sandringham Women's Institute, an organization"
" It is clear that each generation faces new challenges and opportunities. While we are looking for new answers in the modern era, I prefer at least the known and tested recipes, know how to talk to each other and respect the different points of view, get together to find points of convergence and never lose sight of what who is more. important, "said Queen Elizabeth II." For me, these approaches are timeless and I recommend them to all. "
This is not the first time that the Queen Elizabeth II made statements that could be interpreted as references to the Brexit and the current political and social moment in the UK In his Christmas 2018 address, he had already stated that "even in the face of profound differences others with respect and as a human being is always a good first step towards a better understanding. "
In 2014, on the eve of a referendum on the independence of Scotland – which dictates, with 55.3% of the votes, the permanence of this nation in the United Kingdom – Queen Elizabeth II has already made a statement which, though brief, has caused the strangeness and has also displeased in favor of to the Unionist cause. "I hope that people will reflect with great oup attention to the future, "said the queen.
The Queen's remarks fit into the context of a growing reversal of British policy, such as the date of the takeover of Brexit on March 29 of this year. , approach without glow of an agreement between the government of Theresa May and Brussels that the House of Commons is ready to approve.
The first Brexit agreement designed between the British government and the European Union was signed in the House of Commons. January 15 this year, by 230 votes – the biggest defeat of a government proposal in the history of British democracy.
This Monday, Theresa May is committed to presenting the House of Commons a Plan B, but what proposed not only announced an intention – seek new solutions at the border between the two Irish is not closed after the Brexit – and two symbolic measures – the creation of Brexit's Cussion com between all parties and canceling the fee of £ 65 that every EU citizen living in the UK should pay to stay there legally.
The same day Theresa May presented her Plan B Labor MP Yvette Cooper presented an amendment to the House of Commons which, if pbaded in a vote, could allow the British Parliament to decide Brexit in the absence of an agreement on the exit of the UK from the EU. until the 26th of February. This could lead members to vote in favor of the cancellation or extension of Article 50 – the instrument provided for in the Lisbon Treaty to trigger the withdrawal of a member. EU countries – or to prevent a Brexit without an agreement with Brussels
This result preoccupies the most favorable Brexit sections of the House of Commons, particularly the members of the European Research Group, which groups together mainly deputies from the Conservative Party and led by the representative Jacob Rees-Mogg
"If the scenario of an undisputed Brexit left the table, His Majesty's government [designação formal do executivo britânico] should be persuaded to do so.This can not happen if the government is determined to end it. "said the Conservative MP at a conference. Jacob Rees-Mogg said that if Brexit was banned because of the lack of an agreement, the government could seek the extension of parliament to the monarch.
normally lasts only three days and any law in process before the expiry of the extension. I think it would be the government's response. "On the other hand, he said that if the government allowed the Brexit blocking in the absence of agreement, would be "the failure" of Theresa May's executive. "And it would be up to the MPs to hold the government accountable," he said, says Jacob Rees-Mogg.
Source link
